mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017357.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "777",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 777 Filed 08/10/22 Page 8 of 13 LCT1MAXT\n1 moved on. I know that she started dating --\" and then the\n2 objection. That's where the objection is. And that's what I\n3 sustained. So I agree with the defense's version that these\n4 redactions are proper. So just clarify -- sorry. I closed it.\n5 But you'll confirm the right one is going back.\n6 If the question had been objected to, then the whole\n7 answer would be struck. In the absence of the question being\n8 objected to, it's at the point of the objection that that\n9 response gets struck.\n10 Anything else?\n11 MR. EVERDELL: Not from the defense, your Honor.\n12 THE COURT: Okay. Anything from the government?\n13 MS. MODE: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n14 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n15 THE DEPUTY CLERK: All rise.\n16 (Recess; 10:08 a.m.)\n17 (In open court; 2:15 p.m.)\n18 THE COURT: I received a note.\n19 \"May we please have the Larry Visoski transcript.\"\n20 Court Exhibit 20.\n21 MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor, we'll print that.\n22 THE COURT: Thank you.\n23 Anything else, counsel?\n24 MS. MODE: Not from the government, your Honor.\n25 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. Thank you.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017357",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 777 Filed 08/10/22 Page 8 of 13 LCT1MAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 moved on. I know that she started dating --\" and then the\n2 objection. That's where the objection is. And that's what I\n3 sustained. So I agree with the defense's version that these\n4 redactions are proper. So just clarify -- sorry. I closed it.\n5 But you'll confirm the right one is going back.\n6 If the question had been objected to, then the whole\n7 answer would be struck. In the absence of the question being\n8 objected to, it's at the point of the objection that that\n9 response gets struck.\n10 Anything else?\n11 MR. EVERDELL: Not from the defense, your Honor.\n12 THE COURT: Okay. Anything from the government?\n13 MS. MODE: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n14 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n15 THE DEPUTY CLERK: All rise.\n16 (Recess; 10:08 a.m.)\n17 (In open court; 2:15 p.m.)\n18 THE COURT: I received a note.\n19 \"May we please have the Larry Visoski transcript.\"\n20 Court Exhibit 20.\n21 MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor, we'll print that.\n22 THE COURT: Thank you.\n23 Anything else, counsel?\n24 MS. MODE: Not from the government, your Honor.\n25 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. Thank you.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017357",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. MODE",
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "Larry Visoski"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "10:08 a.m.",
      "2:15 p.m."
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 777",
      "Court Exhibit 20",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017357"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}