mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017589.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "227",
    "document_number": "743",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 227 of 247 359 LBUVMAX6 Jane - direct lie. MS. MENNINGER: In cooperating situations, your Honor, the sentence happens after the testimony. THE COURT: Well, they are not the same, but I think the point is the same. I'll give a limiting instruction that -- after she testifies, that the jury should understand she's not providing legal instruction, but testifying as to her understanding in response to the question. And so with that -- and you'll say the question again, make sure it's phrased from her understanding. With that, I'll overrule. I don't see any reason this should be sealed. MS. MOE: No, your Honor. MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. MS. MOE: Just to avoid a second sidebar, I just wanted to flag, after asking this question, I expect the next question I would ask would be just simply, Do you have a financial stake in the outcome of this case? Again, that's about her understanding, whether she believes she has a financial -- which is exactly what the defense suggested in their opening. THE COURT: Oh, there's no doubt. MS. MOE: I just want to flag that. THE COURT: You have an objection to that question? MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. But I think she does SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 227 of 247 359 LBUVMAX6 Jane - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "lie. MS. MENNINGER: In cooperating situations, your Honor, the sentence happens after the testimony. THE COURT: Well, they are not the same, but I think the point is the same. I'll give a limiting instruction that -- after she testifies, that the jury should understand she's not providing legal instruction, but testifying as to her understanding in response to the question. And so with that -- and you'll say the question again, make sure it's phrased from her understanding. With that, I'll overrule. I don't see any reason this should be sealed. MS. MOE: No, your Honor. MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. MS. MOE: Just to avoid a second sidebar, I just wanted to flag, after asking this question, I expect the next question I would ask would be just simply, Do you have a financial stake in the outcome of this case? Again, that's about her understanding, whether she believes she has a financial -- which is exactly what the defense suggested in their opening. THE COURT: Oh, there's no doubt. MS. MOE: I just want to flag that. THE COURT: You have an objection to that question? MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. But I think she does",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "743",
      "227",
      "247",
      "359",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}