mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00017623.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "14",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 14 of 264 420 LC1VMAX1\n\n1 the application. All she said about the photograph was, That's\n2 the address that I lived in. And so we just don't have a --\n3 she looked at your photograph, she looked at the address\n4 written on it; she said that's the address where I lived.\n5 That's not yet in contradiction to her statement, because\n6 there's a timeline issue. But you can try, again, to see if\n7 there's a basis for impeachment.\n8 MR. EVERDELL: All right. I'll leave it to\n9 Ms. Menninger, who's going to be doing the cross.\n10 THE COURT: Okay.\n11 Any questions about that, Ms. Menninger?\n12 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. I think I can ask her\n13 questions today that explain when she lived where --\n14 THE COURT: Great.\n15 MS. MENNINGER: -- what was on her applications. What\n16 she said in her 302, which was already discussed on the record,\n17 is that she lived in the same place from the time she met\n18 Epstein until she moved to New York. That was her statement.\n19 She continued on --\n20 THE COURT: You mean that's the statement recorded in\n21 the 302.\n22 MS. MENNINGER: That is one of the statements recorded\n23 in the 302 verbatim.\n24 THE COURT: Right. Sorry, verbatim. She said it was\n25 a typo. It's a type-up of agents' notes, is it not?\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017623",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 14 of 264 420 LC1VMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017623",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 the application. All she said about the photograph was, That's\n2 the address that I lived in. And so we just don't have a --\n3 she looked at your photograph, she looked at the address\n4 written on it; she said that's the address where I lived.\n5 That's not yet in contradiction to her statement, because\n6 there's a timeline issue. But you can try, again, to see if\n7 there's a basis for impeachment.\n8 MR. EVERDELL: All right. I'll leave it to\n9 Ms. Menninger, who's going to be doing the cross.\n10 THE COURT: Okay.\n11 Any questions about that, Ms. Menninger?\n12 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. I think I can ask her\n13 questions today that explain when she lived where --\n14 THE COURT: Great.\n15 MS. MENNINGER: -- what was on her applications. What\n16 she said in her 302, which was already discussed on the record,\n17 is that she lived in the same place from the time she met\n18 Epstein until she moved to New York. That was her statement.\n19 She continued on --\n20 THE COURT: You mean that's the statement recorded in\n21 the 302.\n22 MS. MENNINGER: That is one of the statements recorded\n23 in the 302 verbatim.\n24 THE COURT: Right. Sorry, verbatim. She said it was\n25 a typo. It's a type-up of agents' notes, is it not?",
      "position": "main"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "302",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017623"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}