DOJ-OGR-00017948.json 3.8 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "75",
  4. "document_number": "747",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 228 LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct 751 1 (Counsel conferred) 2 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I think the issue or the concern from the government is that -- 3 THE COURT: Can we start with the answer to my 4 question, and then tell me what the issue is. 5 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, unfortunately, I think the 6 question -- the answer is a little complicated because -- 7 THE COURT: I can handle it. 8 MS. POMERANTZ: In the sense that I don't -- your 9 Honor, I have no doubt in that. I meant that it's not a yes or 10 no answer; because I'm a little unclear on what Mr. Pagliuca is 11 intending to do. 12 THE COURT: We're going to see and there might be a 13 line, but that's why I want to just start with the first 14 question, right. 15 So the first question is you made a scope objection. 16 The witness testified about delayed disclosure in the context 17 of sexual abuse. Is it fair cross to ask if there are other 18 reasons for delayed disclosure? 19 20 MS. POMERANTZ: I believe so, your Honor. 21 THE COURT: Okay. So then tell me where you think the 22 line turns from that fair cross into soliciting opinions. 23 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I think the concern is 24 where Mr. Pagliuca intends to ask questions about, you know, 25 You're aware there's theory about X, certain topics. But she SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017948",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 228 LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct 751",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "(Counsel conferred) MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I think the issue or the concern from the government is that -- THE COURT: Can we start with the answer to my question, and then tell me what the issue is. MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, unfortunately, I think the question -- the answer is a little complicated because -- THE COURT: I can handle it. MS. POMERANTZ: In the sense that I don't -- your Honor, I have no doubt in that. I meant that it's not a yes or no answer; because I'm a little unclear on what Mr. Pagliuca is intending to do. THE COURT: We're going to see and there might be a line, but that's why I want to just start with the first question, right. So the first question is you made a scope objection. The witness testified about delayed disclosure in the context of sexual abuse. Is it fair cross to ask if there are other reasons for delayed disclosure? MS. POMERANTZ: I believe so, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. So then tell me where you think the line turns from that fair cross into soliciting opinions. MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I think the concern is where Mr. Pagliuca intends to ask questions about, you know, You're aware there's theory about X, certain topics. But she",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017948",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MS. POMERANTZ",
  36. "THE COURT",
  37. "Mr. Pagliuca"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [
  40. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [],
  43. "dates": [
  44. "08/10/22"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  48. "747",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00017948"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }