mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018058.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "185",
    "document_number": "747",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 185 of 228 861 LC2VMAX6 Alessi - Direct\n\n1 MS. COMEY: No, your Honor. I think our position is clear that we think it should come in at this time, but understood.\n2 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think that's entirely appropriate. I guess the question is are you conditionally admitting it or not.\n3 THE COURT: The reason I ask, do you need -- is there more to do with it now or can we simply reserve and move on till the other witness?\n4 MS. COMEY: I think it's fine to reserve, your Honor.\n5 THE COURT: Okay. So if that's what I do, I won't conditionally admit and we'll take it from there.\n6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay.\n7 THE COURT: Anything to take up before we bring the witness back?\n8 MR. PAGLIUCA: Not from me, your Honor.\n9 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I apologize if I was not clear, but we do want to admit this through this witness. And I do have questions for him about this exhibit, so we are seeking to admit it. I apologize. My colleagues let me know that I was not clear.\n10 THE COURT: It wasn't that you weren't clear. That's an opposite answer of the one you just gave.\n11 MS. COMEY: I apologize, your Honor. I misunderstood the question.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00018058",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 185 of 228 861 LC2VMAX6 Alessi - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. COMEY: No, your Honor. I think our position is clear that we think it should come in at this time, but understood.\n2 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think that's entirely appropriate. I guess the question is are you conditionally admitting it or not.\n3 THE COURT: The reason I ask, do you need -- is there more to do with it now or can we simply reserve and move on till the other witness?\n4 MS. COMEY: I think it's fine to reserve, your Honor.\n5 THE COURT: Okay. So if that's what I do, I won't conditionally admit and we'll take it from there.\n6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay.\n7 THE COURT: Anything to take up before we bring the witness back?\n8 MR. PAGLIUCA: Not from me, your Honor.\n9 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I apologize if I was not clear, but we do want to admit this through this witness. And I do have questions for him about this exhibit, so we are seeking to admit it. I apologize. My colleagues let me know that I was not clear.\n10 THE COURT: It wasn't that you weren't clear. That's an opposite answer of the one you just gave.\n11 MS. COMEY: I apologize, your Honor. I misunderstood the question.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018058",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "747",
      "DOJ-OGR-00018058"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}