mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018066.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "193",
    "document_number": "747",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 193 of 228 LC2VMAX6 Alessi - Direct does not want me to elicit. I think what he will say is something referring to the content of the exhibit. I don't want to elicit that if your Honor has ruled that I cannot. THE COURT: Fair enough. I mean, it sounds like he gave two responses to the question, right. One is, I saw the date and it's a later date; the other is my name has been removed, my name's not in it, my wife's name is not in it. He hasn't provided that testimony, so I don't know -- it's a logical inference which you may be making. I don't know it's a logical inference that he would make. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, at this point I'll rest on the logical inference that I think the Court can make based on the record before it. I'll move on. THE COURT: So what I'm going to do is sustain the foundation objection at this point. I'll tell the jury to disregard the testimony that he believes it to be a later version of the book from his time. I'll allow the voir dire, and we'll take it from there. MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I apologize. (Counsel conferred) MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think Ms. Moe would like to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00018066",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 193 of 228 LC2VMAX6 Alessi - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "does not want me to elicit. I think what he will say is something referring to the content of the exhibit. I don't want to elicit that if your Honor has ruled that I cannot. THE COURT: Fair enough. I mean, it sounds like he gave two responses to the question, right. One is, I saw the date and it's a later date; the other is my name has been removed, my name's not in it, my wife's name is not in it. He hasn't provided that testimony, so I don't know -- it's a logical inference which you may be making. I don't know it's a logical inference that he would make. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, at this point I'll rest on the logical inference that I think the Court can make based on the record before it. I'll move on. THE COURT: So what I'm going to do is sustain the foundation objection at this point. I'll tell the jury to disregard the testimony that he believes it to be a later version of the book from his time. I'll allow the voir dire, and we'll take it from there. MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I apologize. (Counsel conferred) MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think Ms. Moe would like to",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018066",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Comey",
      "Mr. Pagliuca",
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "747",
      "DOJ-OGR-00018066"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}