DOJ-OGR-00018465.json 4.5 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "128",
  4. "document_number": "751",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 128 of 261 1289 LC6VMAX4\n1 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I would just say that it is not being offered for the truth; it's offered for the fact that she maintained contact with him at a time later than the matters in issue and, therefore, it has relevance.\n2 THE COURT: That's the truth, what you just said.\n3 It's being offered for the truth that she had contact.\n4 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, that part is not hearsay. The content is hearsay. The fact of the contact itself is something else. That's my understanding of it.\n5 THE COURT: Well, okay. She said she emailed with him. If you want to redact the content and show that there were emails, I suppose that's another question. But if you're not -- you want the content, which is consistent with what she testified to.\n6 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I want the dates.\n7 THE COURT: Okay.\n8 MS. STERNHEIM: And that is not hearsay.\n9 THE COURT: All right. So the dates then I would permit -- I'll hear the government's response to this, but with the content redacted.\n10 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'd like to check the transcript, because I thought she had agreed to the dates. And so --\n11 THE COURT: She did.\n12 MS. POMERANTZ: So this seems cumulative, your Honor.\n13 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00018465",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 128 of 261 1289 LC6VMAX4",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I would just say that it is not being offered for the truth; it's offered for the fact that she maintained contact with him at a time later than the matters in issue and, therefore, it has relevance.",
  20. "position": "body"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "2 THE COURT: That's the truth, what you just said.",
  25. "position": "body"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "3 It's being offered for the truth that she had contact.",
  30. "position": "body"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "4 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, that part is not hearsay. The content is hearsay. The fact of the contact itself is something else. That's my understanding of it.",
  35. "position": "body"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "5 THE COURT: Well, okay. She said she emailed with him. If you want to redact the content and show that there were emails, I suppose that's another question. But if you're not -- you want the content, which is consistent with what she testified to.",
  40. "position": "body"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "6 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I want the dates.",
  45. "position": "body"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "7 THE COURT: Okay.",
  50. "position": "body"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "8 MS. STERNHEIM: And that is not hearsay.",
  55. "position": "body"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "9 THE COURT: All right. So the dates then I would permit -- I'll hear the government's response to this, but with the content redacted.",
  60. "position": "body"
  61. },
  62. {
  63. "type": "printed",
  64. "content": "10 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'd like to check the transcript, because I thought she had agreed to the dates. And so --",
  65. "position": "body"
  66. },
  67. {
  68. "type": "printed",
  69. "content": "11 THE COURT: She did.",
  70. "position": "body"
  71. },
  72. {
  73. "type": "printed",
  74. "content": "12 MS. POMERANTZ: So this seems cumulative, your Honor.",
  75. "position": "body"
  76. },
  77. {
  78. "type": "printed",
  79. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  80. "position": "footer"
  81. },
  82. {
  83. "type": "printed",
  84. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018465",
  85. "position": "footer"
  86. }
  87. ],
  88. "entities": {
  89. "people": [
  90. "MS. STERNHEIM",
  91. "THE COURT",
  92. "MS. POMERANTZ"
  93. ],
  94. "organizations": [
  95. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  96. ],
  97. "locations": [],
  98. "dates": [
  99. "08/10/22"
  100. ],
  101. "reference_numbers": [
  102. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  103. "751",
  104. "DOJ-OGR-00018465"
  105. ]
  106. },
  107. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
  108. }