mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018607.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "9",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 264 1431 LC7VMAX1\n1 I got up and when I came to court this morning. I have checked the Westlaw headnotes and there certainly are cases where witnesses are excluded for far more minor infractions than this.\n2\n3\n4\n5 THE COURT: But infractions of what?\n6 MS. MENNINGER: A sequestration order like walked into a courtroom briefly, you know, or an agent was in the room and heard some of the confidential informant's testimony. That's what I've briefly learned from looking at headnotes, your Honor.\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11 Part of my concern is that what you've just heard from the government is those are the two things that Brian volunteered to them. They said they don't know exactly what happened in this conversation. And for all we know, there's more to the conversation than what Brian volunteered, because they may have said, Oh, whoa, don't tell us anymore about that.\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17 So that's one of the reasons why my request is to find out exactly what was communicated to him by Jane before he gets on the stand; and that, I would submit, is something that the Court could ask him about under oath outside the presence of the jury to determine exactly the scope of the violation here.\n18\n19\n20\n21 Because we only know of one document that she told him she had been shown on the stand. I don't know if she told --\n22\n23\n24 THE COURT: Do we know what document?\n25 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00018607",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 264 1431 LC7VMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 I got up and when I came to court this morning. I have checked the Westlaw headnotes and there certainly are cases where witnesses are excluded for far more minor infractions than this.\n5 THE COURT: But infractions of what?\n6 MS. MENNINGER: A sequestration order like walked into a courtroom briefly, you know, or an agent was in the room and heard some of the confidential informant's testimony. That's what I've briefly learned from looking at headnotes, your Honor.\n11 Part of my concern is that what you've just heard from the government is those are the two things that Brian volunteered to them. They said they don't know exactly what happened in this conversation. And for all we know, there's more to the conversation than what Brian volunteered, because they may have said, Oh, whoa, don't tell us anymore about that.\n17 So that's one of the reasons why my request is to find out exactly what was communicated to him by Jane before he gets on the stand; and that, I would submit, is something that the Court could ask him about under oath outside the presence of the jury to determine exactly the scope of the violation here.\n22 Because we only know of one document that she told him she had been shown on the stand. I don't know if she told --\n24 THE COURT: Do we know what document?\n25 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018607",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brian",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "DOJ-OGR-00018607"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}