mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018610.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "12",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 264 1434 LC7VMAX1\ngoing today and flag that later on.\nTHE COURT: Well, we're not going to speed up Brian because he's planning to fly home today. The question is when we have sufficient time to inquire whether there's been an effective violation of the sequestration order and, if so, what the appropriate remedy for that is. So that's going to require a factual investigation by the government, and then legal analysis from both sides as to what an appropriate remedy is in light of what we learn factually.\nMS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. I just wanted to flag a scheduling concern. I certainly don't mean to expedite the issue. We'll thoroughly examine it.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Ms. Menninger, is that --\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: -- sufficient in light of where we are at the moment?\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Other issues?\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nI also conferred with the government this morning in light of the briefing last night on Mr. Flatley's testimony. Because the letter that we received from the government is different from what I was told during a conferral on Friday on this topic. So I've tried to narrow the issues as I understand them to be.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00018610",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 264 1434 LC7VMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "going today and flag that later on.\nTHE COURT: Well, we're not going to speed up Brian because he's planning to fly home today. The question is when we have sufficient time to inquire whether there's been an effective violation of the sequestration order and, if so, what the appropriate remedy for that is. So that's going to require a factual investigation by the government, and then legal analysis from both sides as to what an appropriate remedy is in light of what we learn factually.\nMS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. I just wanted to flag a scheduling concern. I certainly don't mean to expedite the issue. We'll thoroughly examine it.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Ms. Menninger, is that --\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: -- sufficient in light of where we are at the moment?\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Other issues?\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nI also conferred with the government this morning in light of the briefing last night on Mr. Flatley's testimony. Because the letter that we received from the government is different from what I was told during a conferral on Friday on this topic. So I've tried to narrow the issues as I understand them to be.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018610",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brian",
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Mr. Flatley"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "Friday",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "DOJ-OGR-00018610"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}