mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018757.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "159",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 159 of 264 1585 LC7VMAX5 Carolyn - cross 1 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. 2 THE COURT: Right? 3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes. 4 THE COURT: Okay. In other words, let's put it this way: If I grant your motion, do you intend to call the brother? 5 6 MS. MENNINGER: It seems highly unlikely, your Honor. 7 8 THE COURT: Okay. 9 MS. MENNINGER: But, your Honor, two very quick factual issues. One is you may recall that when we began at the final pretrial conference on November 23rd, we specifically requested permission to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with our two experts because we believed that this issue precluded otherwise witnesses listening in or finding out about the testimony of other witnesses, one. 10 11 12 13 14 15 The second point is -- 16 THE COURT: And I said talk it out, confer, and then brief me if you have disagreement. I received no briefing. 17 18 MS. MENNINGER: I think there was no objection to that process, your Honor. 19 20 MR. ROHRBACH: There was no objection. 21 22 MS. MENNINGER: And then the second point is when Jane was released from the stand and the government asked for permission to speak with her about logistical matters, I said at that time, So long as she's admonished that she's not to 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00018757",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 159 of 264 1585 LC7VMAX5 Carolyn - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. 2 THE COURT: Right? 3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes. 4 THE COURT: Okay. In other words, let's put it this way: If I grant your motion, do you intend to call the brother? 5 6 MS. MENNINGER: It seems highly unlikely, your Honor. 7 8 THE COURT: Okay. 9 MS. MENNINGER: But, your Honor, two very quick factual issues. One is you may recall that when we began at the final pretrial conference on November 23rd, we specifically requested permission to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with our two experts because we believed that this issue precluded otherwise witnesses listening in or finding out about the testimony of other witnesses, one. 10 11 12 13 14 15 The second point is -- 16 THE COURT: And I said talk it out, confer, and then brief me if you have disagreement. I received no briefing. 17 18 MS. MENNINGER: I think there was no objection to that process, your Honor. 19 20 MR. ROHRBACH: There was no objection. 21 22 MS. MENNINGER: And then the second point is when Jane was released from the stand and the government asked for permission to speak with her about logistical matters, I said at that time, So long as she's admonished that she's not to",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018757",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "Dr. Rocchio",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "November 23rd"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "DOJ-OGR-00018757"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}