mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018808.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "210",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 210 of 264 1651 LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross\n1 only a penetrative act once?\n2 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. It was the second\n3 incident where Jeffrey Epstein brought another female into the\n4 room. She testified that he briefly penetrated her twice\n5 during that incident. So he inserted his penis into her two\n6 times during that one incident and that was it. So it's one\n7 incident.\n8 THE COURT: Okay. I'm re-persuaded. I'm going to\n9 sustain on 39. But you can ask the question about are there\n10 any allegations in the complaint regarding penetrative sex,\n11 which is as she testified to.\n12 Next paragraph.\n13 MR. PAGLIUCA: 51. And this is the same -- the same\n14 issue.\n15 MS. COMEY: And the same objection, your Honor.\n16 THE COURT: All right. So I'll sustain on 51.\n17 Next.\n18 MR. PAGLIUCA: 57.\n19 THE COURT: And again, you can ask the question, but\n20 it's not, on its face, inconsistent. And I don't think there's\n21 an inference available. And to the extent there is, it would\n22 be cumulative of the question that you're asking.\n23 57.\n24 MS. COMEY: Same objection, your Honor.\n25 THE COURT: All right.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00018808",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 210 of 264 1651 LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 only a penetrative act once?\n2 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. It was the second\n3 incident where Jeffrey Epstein brought another female into the\n4 room. She testified that he briefly penetrated her twice\n5 during that incident. So he inserted his penis into her two\n6 times during that one incident and that was it. So it's one\n7 incident.\n8 THE COURT: Okay. I'm re-persuaded. I'm going to\n9 sustain on 39. But you can ask the question about are there\n10 any allegations in the complaint regarding penetrative sex,\n11 which is as she testified to.\n12 Next paragraph.\n13 MR. PAGLIUCA: 51. And this is the same -- the same\n14 issue.\n15 MS. COMEY: And the same objection, your Honor.\n16 THE COURT: All right. So I'll sustain on 51.\n17 Next.\n18 MR. PAGLIUCA: 57.\n19 THE COURT: And again, you can ask the question, but\n20 it's not, on its face, inconsistent. And I don't think there's\n21 an inference available. And to the extent there is, it would\n22 be cumulative of the question that you're asking.\n23 57.\n24 MS. COMEY: Same objection, your Honor.\n25 THE COURT: All right.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018808",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "DOJ-OGR-00018808"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}