mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018814.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "216",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 264 1657\nLC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross\n1 claim you were given or paid to you by Mr. Epstein or someone,\nyaddah, yaddah. And we have an expansive time frame here. And\n2\nthe question, 2000 to 2006. And then the answer again is she's\n3\nonly paid for May or June of 2002 to August of 2003. So we've\n4\nexcluded two whole years by this answer in terms of the time\n5\nframe the witness testified to.\n6\nTHE COURT: Okay. On the time frame inconsistency,\n7\nI'll allow 17, question and answer.\n8\nWhat's next?\n9\nMR. PAGLIUCA: 19 is all males who had any sexual\n10\ncontact with her. It says sexual assault or battery since age\n11\n10. And the answer is none. And she's testified that there\n12\nwere two males, I believe, that had sexual contact with her.\n13\nMS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe the testimony was\n14\nthat they saw her naked in the massage room. I don't believe\n15\nthere was testimony about sexual contact. I would want to\n16\ncheck the transcript, your Honor, but that is my recollection\n17\nof the testimony.\n18\nTHE COURT: It's mine as well, but you'll check the\n19\ntranscript. In the absence of that, I don't see any\n20\ninconsistency.\n21\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Well, then 20 covers lewd or lascivious\n22\nconduct, which would be naked people in a massage looking at a\n23\nnaked underage --\n24\nMS. COMEY: Again, your Honor, the testimony was just\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00018814",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 264 1657",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Carolyn - cross",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 claim you were given or paid to you by Mr. Epstein or someone,\nyaddah, yaddah. And we have an expansive time frame here. And\nthe question, 2000 to 2006. And then the answer again is she's\nonly paid for May or June of 2002 to August of 2003. So we've\nexcluded two whole years by this answer in terms of the time\nframe the witness testified to.\nTHE COURT: Okay. On the time frame inconsistency,\nI'll allow 17, question and answer.\nWhat's next?\nMR. PAGLIUCA: 19 is all males who had any sexual\ncontact with her. It says sexual assault or battery since age\n10. And the answer is none. And she's testified that there\nwere two males, I believe, that had sexual contact with her.\nMS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe the testimony was\nthat they saw her naked in the massage room. I don't believe\nthere was testimony about sexual contact. I would want to\ncheck the transcript, your Honor, but that is my recollection\nof the testimony.\nTHE COURT: It's mine as well, but you'll check the\ntranscript. In the absence of that, I don't see any\ninconsistency.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Well, then 20 covers lewd or lascivious\nconduct, which would be naked people in a massage looking at a\nnaked underage --\nMS. COMEY: Again, your Honor, the testimony was just",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018814",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Carolyn",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. COMEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2000",
      "2002",
      "2003",
      "2006",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "DOJ-OGR-00018814"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about inconsistencies in a witness's testimony. The transcript is from a case involving Mr. Epstein."
}