DOJ-OGR-00019140.json 4.3 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "16",
  4. "document_number": "757",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 49 1989 LC9VMAXT\n\n1 THE COURT: On scheduling, needless to say, I didn't send you a draft of the charge last night. I think my thinking is if the government rests today or tomorrow, which sounds like what we anticipate, I'll use the remainder of tomorrow, one, to hear the defense motions; and two, for me to work on the charge on my own, having already received your drafts.\n\nAnd then I'll send it to you at some point in advance of a charging conference, which we'll do next week. And again, I'm open to you telling me whether you want to do it in the evenings after testimony or on Saturday. I think really the analysis there depends on what the defense now anticipates as the length of its case.\n\nSo are you in a position to give any additional estimate as to that?\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: We don't, your Honor.\n\nI think we're hoping to take this evening and tomorrow to put those pieces together, and then provide the Court and the government with that analysis.\n\nTHE COURT: Okay. Ms. Sternheim.\n\nMS. STERNHEIM: May I just say, I think it is our thinking at the moment that if we are going to be using the trial days, that our preference would be to Saturday for a charge conference. It seems that it would just be a more focused time.\n\nTHE COURT: I think really the only reason not to do SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00019140",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 49 1989 LC9VMAXT",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 THE COURT: On scheduling, needless to say, I didn't send you a draft of the charge last night. I think my thinking is if the government rests today or tomorrow, which sounds like what we anticipate, I'll use the remainder of tomorrow, one, to hear the defense motions; and two, for me to work on the charge on my own, having already received your drafts.",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "And then I'll send it to you at some point in advance of a charging conference, which we'll do next week. And again, I'm open to you telling me whether you want to do it in the evenings after testimony or on Saturday. I think really the analysis there depends on what the defense now anticipates as the length of its case.",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "So are you in a position to give any additional estimate as to that?",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: We don't, your Honor.",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "I think we're hoping to take this evening and tomorrow to put those pieces together, and then provide the Court and the government with that analysis.",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Sternheim.",
  45. "position": "middle"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "MS. STERNHEIM: May I just say, I think it is our thinking at the moment that if we are going to be using the trial days, that our preference would be to Saturday for a charge conference. It seems that it would just be a more focused time.",
  50. "position": "middle"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "THE COURT: I think really the only reason not to do",
  55. "position": "middle"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00019140",
  60. "position": "footer"
  61. }
  62. ],
  63. "entities": {
  64. "people": [
  65. "MR. PAGLIUCA",
  66. "MS. STERNHEIM"
  67. ],
  68. "organizations": [
  69. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  70. ],
  71. "locations": [],
  72. "dates": [
  73. "08/10/22"
  74. ],
  75. "reference_numbers": [
  76. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  77. "757",
  78. "DOJ-OGR-00019140"
  79. ]
  80. },
  81. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  82. }