mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019405.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "60",
    "date": "09/24/2020",
    "document_type": "Statement of the Case and the Facts",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page6 of 58\n\nStatement of the Case and the Facts\n\nThe indictment.\n\nIn a superseding indictment, the government alleges that Ms. Maxwell:\nconspired with Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts (Count 1); enticed a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts (Count 2); conspired with Epstein to transport minors with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity (Count 3); transported a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity (Count 4); committed perjury in the April 2016 deposition in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y) (Count 5); and committed perjury in the July 2016 deposition in Giuffre v. Maxwell (Count 6). App. 13-30.\n\nThe civil case.\n\nGiuffre v. Maxwell is a long-dismissed defamation case in which Virginia L. Giuffre alleged that Ms. Maxwell defamed her. The alleged defamation centered on a statement from Ms. Maxwell's attorney-hired press agent generally denying as \"untrue\" and \"obvious lies\" plaintiff's numerous allegations, over the span of four years, that Ms. Maxwell participated in a scheme causing her to be \"sexually abused and trafficked\" by Epstein. The case settled after discovery and before trial, and the district court dismissed the case with prejudice in May 2017.\n\n1\nDOJ-OGR-00019405",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page6 of 58",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Statement of the Case and the Facts",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The indictment.\n\nIn a superseding indictment, the government alleges that Ms. Maxwell:\nconspired with Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts (Count 1); enticed a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts (Count 2); conspired with Epstein to transport minors with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity (Count 3); transported a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity (Count 4); committed perjury in the April 2016 deposition in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y) (Count 5); and committed perjury in the July 2016 deposition in Giuffre v. Maxwell (Count 6). App. 13-30.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The civil case.\n\nGiuffre v. Maxwell is a long-dismissed defamation case in which Virginia L. Giuffre alleged that Ms. Maxwell defamed her. The alleged defamation centered on a statement from Ms. Maxwell's attorney-hired press agent generally denying as \"untrue\" and \"obvious lies\" plaintiff's numerous allegations, over the span of four years, that Ms. Maxwell participated in a scheme causing her to be \"sexually abused and trafficked\" by Epstein. The case settled after discovery and before trial, and the district court dismissed the case with prejudice in May 2017.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019405",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Virginia L. Giuffre"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "S.D.N.Y"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "09/24/2020",
      "April 2016",
      "July 2016",
      "May 2017"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "Document 60",
      "2938278",
      "15-cv-7433",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019405"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a legal filing related to the case against Ms. Maxwell, detailing the indictment and a related civil case. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten annotations."
}