mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019415.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "16",
    "document_number": "60",
    "date": "09/24/2020",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page16 of 58 order, App. 99–103; the propriety of modifying the protective order is completely separate from the merits of the government’s criminal allegations against Ms. Maxwell; and appellate review of the order will be impossible following final judgment because a post-judgment appeal will be moot since, by that time, Judge Preska’s decision unsealing the deposition material in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Nos. 20-2413 (2d Cir.)/15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.) will have gone into effect. That is the very point of this appeal, after all: to share with Judge Preska what Ms. Maxwell learned from                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         What’s more, all of this happened while the 11 DOJ-OGR-00019415",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page16 of 58",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "order, App. 99–103; the propriety of modifying the protective order is completely separate from the merits of the government’s criminal allegations against Ms. Maxwell; and appellate review of the order will be impossible following final judgment because a post-judgment appeal will be moot since, by that time, Judge Preska’s decision unsealing the deposition material in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Nos. 20-2413 (2d Cir.)/15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.) will have gone into effect.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "That is the very point of this appeal, after all: to share with Judge Preska what Ms. Maxwell learned from",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "What’s more, all of this happened while the",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "11",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019415",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Preska",
      "Giuffre"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "S.D.N.Y."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "09/24/2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "60",
      "2938278",
      "20-2413",
      "15-cv-7433",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019415"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document contains redactions in the middle section."
}