mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019568.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "120366008380",
    "date": "August 17, 2020",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan August 17, 2020 Page 6 There are at least three compelling reasons to modify the Protective Order. First, The partial secrecy surrounding the Material has also fundamentally undermined the fairness of the adversarial process. Although the grand jury subpoena and government investigation were known to \"The rule does not impose any obligation of secrecy on witnesses.\" Fed. R. Crim. P. 6, Advisory Committee Note to Subdivision 6(e)2. Too many questions remain unanswered including exactly what was said between the government and , when was it said, and precisely what was turned over. Without the ability to use the Material in the very limited fashion proposed Ms. Maxwell she is unfairly disadvantaged Moreover, instead of candidly revealing the fact of the subpoena Second, App.109 DOJ-OGR-00019568",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan August 17, 2020 Page 6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "There are at least three compelling reasons to modify the Protective Order. First,",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The partial secrecy surrounding the Material has also fundamentally undermined the fairness of the adversarial process. Although the grand jury subpoena and government investigation were known to",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "\"The rule does not impose any obligation of secrecy on witnesses.\" Fed. R. Crim. P. 6, Advisory Committee Note to Subdivision 6(e)2.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Too many questions remain unanswered including exactly what was said between the government and , when was it said, and precisely what was turned over. Without the ability to use the Material in the very limited fashion proposed Ms. Maxwell she is unfairly disadvantaged Moreover, instead of candidly revealing the fact of the subpoena",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Second,",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "App.109 DOJ-OGR-00019568",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "August 17, 2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "120366008380",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019568"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with redactions, likely related to a high-profile case involving Ms. Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with some redactions indicated by black bars."
}