mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019605.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "14 of 15",
    "document_number": "69",
    "date": "09/28/2020",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 69, 09/28/2020, 2940206, Page14 of 15\n\nwith the benefit of knowing what everyone else knows will become moot once the deposition material is unsealed (as this Court already recognized by staying the unsealing order pending appeal).\n\nFinally, it is appropriate for this Court to issue a writ of mandamus because, as explained in Ms. Maxwell's motion to consolidate, the judges in the Southern District of New York have reached inconsistent decisions to prejudice of Ms. Maxwell. A writ of mandamus is appropriate because only this Court can guarantee that all the judges below are on the same page.\n\nConclusion\n\nFor these reasons, as well as those given in the opening brief, Doc. 60, pp 10-22, this Court should deny the government's motion to dismiss the appeal.\n\nSeptember 28, 2020.\n\n13\nDOJ-OGR-00019605",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 69, 09/28/2020, 2940206, Page14 of 15",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "with the benefit of knowing what everyone else knows will become moot once the deposition material is unsealed (as this Court already recognized by staying the unsealing order pending appeal).",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Finally, it is appropriate for this Court to issue a writ of mandamus because, as explained in Ms. Maxwell's motion to consolidate, the judges in the Southern District of New York have reached inconsistent decisions to prejudice of Ms. Maxwell. A writ of mandamus is appropriate because only this Court can guarantee that all the judges below are on the same page.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Conclusion",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "For these reasons, as well as those given in the opening brief, Doc. 60, pp 10-22, this Court should deny the government's motion to dismiss the appeal.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "September 28, 2020.",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "13",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019605",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "Southern District of New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "September 28, 2020",
      "09/28/2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "69",
      "2940206",
      "Doc. 60",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019605"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case involving Ms. Maxwell. The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document includes a case number, document number, and date at the top."
}