mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019609.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "82",
    "date": "10/02/2020",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page2 of 37\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\nPAGE\nPreliminary Statement ............................................ 1\nStatement of Facts ............................................... 2\nA. The Indictment ................................................ 2\nB. The Protective Order ............................................ 3\nC. The District Court Litigation .................................... 4\nD. Judge Nathan's Order ............................................ 7\nE. Maxwell's Appeal of the Order .................................... 7\nARGUMENT:\nPoint I—This Court Lacks Jurisdiction To Hear This Appeal ............... 8\nA. Applicable Law ................................................ 8\nB. Discussion .................................................... 12\nPoint II—The District Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion in Denying Maxwell's Motion to Modify the Protective Order ................ 21\nA. Applicable Law ................................................ 21\nB. Discussion .................................................... 23\nCONCLUSION ........................................................ 30\nDOJ-OGR-00019609",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page2 of 37",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PAGE",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Preliminary Statement ............................................ 1\nStatement of Facts ............................................... 2\nA. The Indictment ................................................ 2\nB. The Protective Order ............................................ 3\nC. The District Court Litigation .................................... 4\nD. Judge Nathan's Order ............................................ 7\nE. Maxwell's Appeal of the Order .................................... 7\nARGUMENT:\nPoint I—This Court Lacks Jurisdiction To Hear This Appeal ............... 8\nA. Applicable Law ................................................ 8\nB. Discussion .................................................... 12\nPoint II—The District Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion in Denying Maxwell's Motion to Modify the Protective Order ................ 21\nA. Applicable Law ................................................ 21\nB. Discussion .................................................... 23\nCONCLUSION ........................................................ 30",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019609",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Judge Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/02/2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "82",
      "2944267",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019609"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case involving Maxwell. The table of contents suggests that the document contains legal arguments and discussions related to the case. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}