| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "2",
- "document_number": "95",
- "date": "10/08/2020",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 95, 10/08/2020, 2948488, Page2 of 5\n20-3061\nUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant.\nON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 20-CR-330 (AJN)\nUnopposed Motion for Leave to File Unredacted Reply Brief under Seal\nDefendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her attorneys Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., moves unopposed for leave to file her unredacted reply brief under seal. As grounds for this request, Ms. Maxwell states:\nThis appeal addresses an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413,\n1\nDOJ-OGR-00019671",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 95, 10/08/2020, 2948488, Page2 of 5",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "20-3061",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 20-CR-330 (AJN)",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Unredacted Reply Brief under Seal",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her attorneys Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., moves unopposed for leave to file her unredacted reply brief under seal. As grounds for this request, Ms. Maxwell states:",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "This appeal addresses an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413,",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019671",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ghislaine Maxwell",
- "Nathan",
- "Giuffre"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
- "Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.",
- "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "United States",
- "New York"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "10/08/2020"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "20-3061",
- "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
- "20-2413",
- "2948488",
- "DOJ-OGR-00019671"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing in a high-profile case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|