mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019680.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4 of 4",
    "document_number": "104-1",
    "date": "10/19/2020",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 104-1, 10/19/2020, 2955206, Page4 of 4\n\nappeal concerns an unsealing order. Further, as the District Court correctly noted, Maxwell \"provide[s] no coherent explanation\" connecting the discovery materials at issue in the criminal case to the civil litigation.\n\nCONCLUSION\n\nWe have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell on appeal and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is DISMISSED and the motion to consolidate is DENIED as moot.\n\nAny appeal in this criminal case shall be referred to another panel in the ordinary course.\n\nFOR THE COURT:\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk\n\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe\nSECOND CIRCUIT\n\n4\nDOJ-OGR-00019680",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 104-1, 10/19/2020, 2955206, Page4 of 4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "appeal concerns an unsealing order. Further, as the District Court correctly noted, Maxwell \"provide[s] no coherent explanation\" connecting the discovery materials at issue in the criminal case to the civil litigation.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CONCLUSION",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "We have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell on appeal and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is DISMISSED and the motion to consolidate is DENIED as moot.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Any appeal in this criminal case shall be referred to another panel in the ordinary course.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "FOR THE COURT:\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "SECOND CIRCUIT",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019680",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "District Court",
      "SECOND CIRCUIT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/19/2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "104-1",
      "2955206",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019680"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It is a formal legal document with a clear structure and language. The document includes a conclusion section, a signature block, and a stamp from the Second Circuit Court. The text is mostly printed, with a handwritten signature. The document is in good condition, with no visible damage or redactions."
}