mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019895.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "26",
    "document_number": "18",
    "date": "07/10/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 18 Filed 07/10/20 Page 26 of 36\nsuffered severe professional and reputational damage simply by being associated with her. Ms. Maxwell therefore did what any responsible person would do - she separated herself from everyone she cares about and removed herself from the public eye in order to keep herself and her friends out of harm's way.12\nLacking any evidence required under the governing standard that Ms. Maxwell presents an \"actual risk of flight,\" Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 75, the government's flight risk argument is reduced to the following: Ms. Maxwell is a woman of means who has foreign citizenship and has traveled internationally in the past, and who now faces serious charges.\nBut if that were sufficient, then virtually every defendant with a foreign passport and any meaningful amount of funds would need to be detained as a flight risk. See Hung v. United States 439 U.S. 1326, 1329 (1978) (to detain based on risk of flight, government must show more than \"opportunities for flight,\" and instead must establish an \"inclination on the part of [the defendant] to flee\"). That is not what the Bail Reform Act requires. Indeed, courts in this Circuit and elsewhere commonly find that bail conditions can adequately address risk of flight, even where individuals have foreign citizenship and passports or otherwise substantial foreign connections, and financial means. See, e.g., Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 66; United States v. Hansen, 108 F. App'x 331 (6th Cir. 2004); United States v. Hanson, 613 F. Supp. 2d 85 (D.D.C. 2009); United States v. Bodmer, No. 03-cr-947(SAS), 2004 WL 169790, at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 28. 2004); United States v. Karni, 298 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2004); United States v. Kashoggi, 717 F. Supp. 1048, 1050-52 (S.D.N.Y. 1989).\nFinally, the ongoing travel restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic would pose a significant hurdle to Ms. Maxwell's ability to flee the United States, particularly to\n12 The media spotlight has also drawn out people who claim to speak for Ms. Maxwell, and even purport to have had direct communications with her, but who, in fact, have no ties to Ms. Maxwell whatsoever. One such person has even given numerous television interviews on news shows in the United Kingdom.\n16\nDOJ-OGR-00019895",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 18 Filed 07/10/20 Page 26 of 36",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "suffered severe professional and reputational damage simply by being associated with her. Ms. Maxwell therefore did what any responsible person would do - she separated herself from everyone she cares about and removed herself from the public eye in order to keep herself and her friends out of harm's way.12",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Lacking any evidence required under the governing standard that Ms. Maxwell presents an \"actual risk of flight,\" Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 75, the government's flight risk argument is reduced to the following: Ms. Maxwell is a woman of means who has foreign citizenship and has traveled internationally in the past, and who now faces serious charges.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "But if that were sufficient, then virtually every defendant with a foreign passport and any meaningful amount of funds would need to be detained as a flight risk. See Hung v. United States 439 U.S. 1326, 1329 (1978) (to detain based on risk of flight, government must show more than \"opportunities for flight,\" and instead must establish an \"inclination on the part of [the defendant] to flee\"). That is not what the Bail Reform Act requires. Indeed, courts in this Circuit and elsewhere commonly find that bail conditions can adequately address risk of flight, even where individuals have foreign citizenship and passports or otherwise substantial foreign connections, and financial means. See, e.g., Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 66; United States v. Hansen, 108 F. App'x 331 (6th Cir. 2004); United States v. Hanson, 613 F. Supp. 2d 85 (D.D.C. 2009); United States v. Bodmer, No. 03-cr-947(SAS), 2004 WL 169790, at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 28. 2004); United States v. Karni, 298 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2004); United States v. Kashoggi, 717 F. Supp. 1048, 1050-52 (S.D.N.Y. 1989).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Finally, the ongoing travel restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic would pose a significant hurdle to Ms. Maxwell's ability to flee the United States, particularly to",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "12 The media spotlight has also drawn out people who claim to speak for Ms. Maxwell, and even purport to have had direct communications with her, but who, in fact, have no ties to Ms. Maxwell whatsoever. One such person has even given numerous television interviews on news shows in the United Kingdom.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "16",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019895",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Hung",
      "Sabhnani",
      "Hansen",
      "Hanson",
      "Bodmer",
      "Karni",
      "Kashoggi"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States",
      "Bail Reform Act"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States",
      "United Kingdom"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/10/20",
      "1978",
      "Jan. 28. 2004",
      "1989"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 18",
      "493 F.3d",
      "439 U.S. 1326",
      "108 F. App'x 331",
      "613 F. Supp. 2d 85",
      "No. 03-cr-947(SAS)",
      "2004 WL 169790",
      "298 F. Supp. 2d 129",
      "717 F. Supp. 1048",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019895"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell, discussing her flight risk and bail conditions. The text is printed, with no handwritten content or stamps. The document is page 26 of 36."
}