mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019948.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "89",
    "document_number": "39-2",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page89 of 200\n26\narrest of Mr. Epstein. Is that accurate and did that include information as to her whereabouts?\nMS. MOE: Your Honor, that information did not include information about her whereabouts for starters; and, second, your Honor, the defendant's communications through counsel with the government began when the government served the defendant with a grand jury subpoena following the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. So it is unsurprising that her counsel reached out to the government, which is in the ordinary course when an investigation becomes overt.\nThe government's communications with defense counsel have been minimal during the pendency of this investigation. Without getting into the substance, those contacts have not been substantial, your Honor. And to the court's question, they certainly have not included any information about the defendant's whereabouts.\nTHE COURT: All right. Go ahead.\nMS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\nIt appears that the defendant has insufficient ties to motivate her to remain in the United States. With respect to her family circumstances, she does not have children, she does not appear to reside with any immediate family members, and she doesn't have any employment that would require her to remain in the United States.\nBut, by contrast, she has extensive international\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00019948",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page89 of 200",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "arrest of Mr. Epstein. Is that accurate and did that include information as to her whereabouts?\nMS. MOE: Your Honor, that information did not include information about her whereabouts for starters; and, second, your Honor, the defendant's communications through counsel with the government began when the government served the defendant with a grand jury subpoena following the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. So it is unsurprising that her counsel reached out to the government, which is in the ordinary course when an investigation becomes overt.\nThe government's communications with defense counsel have been minimal during the pendency of this investigation. Without getting into the substance, those contacts have not been substantial, your Honor. And to the court's question, they certainly have not included any information about the defendant's whereabouts.\nTHE COURT: All right. Go ahead.\nMS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\nIt appears that the defendant has insufficient ties to motivate her to remain in the United States. With respect to her family circumstances, she does not have children, she does not appear to reside with any immediate family members, and she doesn't have any employment that would require her to remain in the United States.\nBut, by contrast, she has extensive international",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019948",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/01/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-58",
      "Document 39-2",
      "3068530",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019948"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with no visible redactions or damage."
}