| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "114",
- "document_number": "39-2",
- "date": "04/01/2021",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page114 of 200\n\n1 arrest. That defendant was released on bail conditions, strict bail conditions.\n2\n3 And I mention Esposito, which is the 2019 case from\n4 Judge Marrero, that is a case in which the allegation was that\n5 the defendant was a senior ranking member of organized crime\n6 and had access to financial means as well.\n7\n8 But all of those cases, as well as Madoff and Dreier,\n9 which I'm sure the court is familiar, with involved allegations\n10 of defendants with hundreds of millions of dollars, in all of\n11 those cases, the courts held that bail should be set subject to\n12 strict conditions. And by the way, Judge, in all of those\n13 cases, the defendants appeared for court. They all made\n14 appearances and appeared for trial.\n15\n16 There are also cases from the context involving\n17 pornography or sex crime allegations, such as the Deutsch case\n18 coming from the Eastern District several years ago, the Conway\n19 case in the Northern District of California. Again,\n20 understanding those are the allegations, the decision was made\n21 that release could be awarded on conditions.\n22\n23 You even had one recently in the Second Circuit that\n24 I'm sure everyone is familiar with United States v. Mattis,\n25 different setting, because that was a dangerousness case and\n26 the government is not proceeding on dangerousness grounds, but\n27 that is the case where the allegation is that two attorneys\n28 threw a Molotov cocktail into a police car; challenge to bail\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019973",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page114 of 200",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 arrest. That defendant was released on bail conditions, strict bail conditions.\n\n3 And I mention Esposito, which is the 2019 case from\n4 Judge Marrero, that is a case in which the allegation was that\n5 the defendant was a senior ranking member of organized crime\n6 and had access to financial means as well.\n\n8 But all of those cases, as well as Madoff and Dreier,\n9 which I'm sure the court is familiar, with involved allegations\n10 of defendants with hundreds of millions of dollars, in all of\n11 those cases, the courts held that bail should be set subject to\n12 strict conditions. And by the way, Judge, in all of those\n13 cases, the defendants appeared for court. They all made\n14 appearances and appeared for trial.\n\n16 There are also cases from the context involving\n17 pornography or sex crime allegations, such as the Deutsch case\n18 coming from the Eastern District several years ago, the Conway\n19 case in the Northern District of California. Again,\n20 understanding those are the allegations, the decision was made\n21 that release could be awarded on conditions.\n\n23 You even had one recently in the Second Circuit that\n24 I'm sure everyone is familiar with United States v. Mattis,\n25 different setting, because that was a dangerousness case and\n26 the government is not proceeding on dangerousness grounds, but\n27 that is the case where the allegation is that two attorneys\n28 threw a Molotov cocktail into a police car; challenge to bail",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019973",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Esposito",
- "Marrero",
- "Madoff",
- "Dreier",
- "Deutsch",
- "Conway",
- "Mattis"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [
- "Eastern District",
- "Northern District of California",
- "Second Circuit"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "04/01/2021",
- "2019"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "Case 21-58",
- "Document 39-2",
- "3068530",
- "DOJ-OGR-00019973"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is typed, and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name and contact information of the court reporters."
- }
|