Home Esplora Aiuto
Accedi
github-mirrors
/
mirror-epstein-docs
1
0
Forka 0
File Problemi 0 Pull Requests 0 Wiki
Albero (Tree): 4e6eb4446d
Rami (Branch) Tag
mirror-epstein-...
/
results
/
IMAGES007
/
DOJ-OGR-00019983.json

DOJ-OGR-00019983.json 4.4 KB
Cronologia Originale

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253 
  1. {
    2. 

  2.   "document_metadata": {
    3. 

  3.     "page_number": "124",
    4. 

  4.     "document_number": "39-2",
    5. 

  5.     "date": "04/01/2021",
    6. 

  6.     "document_type": "court document",
    7. 

  7.     "has_handwriting": false,
    8. 

  8.     "has_stamps": false
    9. 

  9.   },
    10. 

  10.   "full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page124 of 200\nk7e2MaxC kjc\n1 The government also says, well, she has 15 different bank accounts -- and here we get some hedging language -- that are by or associated with her. No detail, no explanation to the court, just more dirt. Well, she has three bank accounts that she disclosed. She believes that there are more, for example, with respect to the not-for-profit that she ran for almost a decade before she was forced to shut it down because of the issues in the media and the attention and the firestorm. So it is some number less. And if it's important to the court, we will do our best to pull it together. But under the relevant cases, it doesn't change the analysis.\n12 And then we go through the last one, your Honor. They say in their brief that she did transfers of funds. One was a transfer of 500,000. We believe that what that is was a bond maturing. So when a bond matures, it is transferred out.\n16 And then there was another one, and the government sort of changes its mind between its opening brief and its reply brief and I'm sure by tomorrow they will have some new speculation for your Honor, but essentially let's call it a several hundred thousand transfer out of and account in June and July of 2019. What's that refer to? It refers to one of the themes we have been talking about in our submission and today your Honor. When Mr. Epstein was arrested, it had all kinds of effects on our client, one of which was that the bank in question referenced in the government's submission dropped\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00019983",
    11. 

  11.   "text_blocks": [
    12. 

  12.     {
    13. 

  13.       "type": "printed",
    14. 

  14.       "content": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page124 of 200",
    15. 

  15.       "position": "header"
    16. 

  16.     },
    17. 

  17.     {
    18. 

  18.       "type": "printed",
    19. 

  19.       "content": "The government also says, well, she has 15 different bank accounts -- and here we get some hedging language -- that are by or associated with her. No detail, no explanation to the court, just more dirt. Well, she has three bank accounts that she disclosed. She believes that there are more, for example, with respect to the not-for-profit that she ran for almost a decade before she was forced to shut it down because of the issues in the media and the attention and the firestorm. So it is some number less. And if it's important to the court, we will do our best to pull it together. But under the relevant cases, it doesn't change the analysis.\nAnd then we go through the last one, your Honor. They say in their brief that she did transfers of funds. One was a transfer of 500,000. We believe that what that is was a bond maturing. So when a bond matures, it is transferred out.\nAnd then there was another one, and the government sort of changes its mind between its opening brief and its reply brief and I'm sure by tomorrow they will have some new speculation for your Honor, but essentially let's call it a several hundred thousand transfer out of and account in June and July of 2019. What's that refer to? It refers to one of the themes we have been talking about in our submission and today your Honor. When Mr. Epstein was arrested, it had all kinds of effects on our client, one of which was that the bank in question referenced in the government's submission dropped",
    20. 

  20.       "position": "main content"
    21. 

  21.     },
    22. 

  22.     {
    23. 

  23.       "type": "printed",
    24. 

  24.       "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
    25. 

  25.       "position": "footer"
    26. 

  26.     },
    27. 

  27.     {
    28. 

  28.       "type": "printed",
    29. 

  29.       "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019983",
    30. 

  30.       "position": "footer"
    31. 

  31.     }
    32. 

  32.   ],
    33. 

  33.   "entities": {
    34. 

  34.     "people": [
    35. 

  35.       "Mr. Epstein"
    36. 

  36.     ],
    37. 

  37.     "organizations": [
    38. 

  38.       "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    39. 

  39.     ],
    40. 

  40.     "locations": [],
    41. 

  41.     "dates": [
    42. 

  42.       "04/01/2021",
    43. 

  43.       "June and July of 2019"
    44. 

  44.     ],
    45. 

  45.     "reference_numbers": [
    46. 

  46.       "Case 21-58",
    47. 

  47.       "Document 39-2",
    48. 

  48.       "3068530",
    49. 

  49.       "DOJ-OGR-00019983"
    50. 

  50.     ]
    51. 

  51.   },
    52. 

  52.   "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. It is typed and contains no handwritten text or stamps. The content discusses a legal case involving a client and the government, referencing bank accounts and financial transactions."
    53. 

  53. }
    54.