mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020428.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "42 of 91",
    "document_number": "1-2",
    "date": "07/08/2022",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page42 of 91\nJudge Alison J. Nathan on 6/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 06/16/2021)\n06/16/2021 302 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 7, 2021 re: MDC Conditions Update Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/16/2021)\n06/25/2021 303 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED. The Court sets out its reasoning in an opinion concurrently filed under temporary seal to allow Maxwell and the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. The parties may file under seal any proposed redactions to the opinion within three days. The Court further ORDERS that the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Government's application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application shall be unsealed. These documents were previously filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Within one week, the parties shall confer and file under seal any proposed redactions to the memorandum decision, order, and transcripts. Any proposed redactions shall be narrowly tailored and shall be supported with reference to the Second Circuit's opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties proposed redactions should not include any information that has already been made public. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jbo) (Entered: 06/25/2021)\n06/25/2021 304 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court grants the Defendant's request that going forward the Government shall only file updates if there are any material changes to Ms. Maxwell's conditions of confinement. See Dkt. No. 300 at 1. In the absence of any other specific or supported application for relief from the Defendant, the Court will take no further action at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/25/2021)\n06/25/2021 307 OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell moves to suppress evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena to a law firm involved in earlier civil litigation against her. She contends that because the documents sought by the subpoena were previously subject to a protective order, the Government obtained them in violation of her rights against self-incrimination, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and due to process of law. For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the Government did not violate Maxwell's constitutional rights when it obtained evidence covered by a protective order in her earlier civil case. It further finds that Maxwell is not entitled to suppression of any evidence or to an evidentiary hearing. The Court thus DENIES Maxwell's motions to suppress (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jw) (Entered: 07/01/2021)\n06/30/2021 305 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Pursuant to the Court's order of June 25, 2021 (Dkt. No. 303), any proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence must be filed no later than today, June 30, 2021. Any proposed redactions to the other documents ordered unsealed in that order must be filed no later than July 2, 2021. The parties shall file a joint letter by each of these dates informing the Court if no redactions are sought. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/30/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 06/30/2021)\n06/30/2021 306 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 30, 2021 re: Joint Letter re June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order and Defense Exhibits Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/30/2021)\n07/01/2021 308 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. No party has proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence or the documents ordered unsealed in the Courts June 25, 2021 Order (Dkt. No. 303). Thus, the Court lifts the temporary seal on its June 25, 2021 opinion on Maxwells motions to suppress. It also unseals the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Governments application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application, originally filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Maxwell shall\nDOJ-OGR-00020428",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page42 of 91",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 06/16/2021)",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/16/2021 302 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 7, 2021 re: MDC Conditions Update Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/16/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/25/2021 303 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED. The Court sets out its reasoning in an opinion concurrently filed under temporary seal to allow Maxwell and the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. The parties may file under seal any proposed redactions to the opinion within three days. The Court further ORDERS that the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Government's application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application shall be unsealed. These documents were previously filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Within one week, the parties shall confer and file under seal any proposed redactions to the memorandum decision, order, and transcripts. Any proposed redactions shall be narrowly tailored and shall be supported with reference to the Second Circuit's opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties proposed redactions should not include any information that has already been made public. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jbo) (Entered: 06/25/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/25/2021 304 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court grants the Defendant's request that going forward the Government shall only file updates if there are any material changes to Ms. Maxwell's conditions of confinement. See Dkt. No. 300 at 1. In the absence of any other specific or supported application for relief from the Defendant, the Court will take no further action at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/25/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/25/2021 307 OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell moves to suppress evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena to a law firm involved in earlier civil litigation against her. She contends that because the documents sought by the subpoena were previously subject to a protective order, the Government obtained them in violation of her rights against self-incrimination, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and due to process of law. For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the Government did not violate Maxwell's constitutional rights when it obtained evidence covered by a protective order in her earlier civil case. It further finds that Maxwell is not entitled to suppression of any evidence or to an evidentiary hearing. The Court thus DENIES Maxwell's motions to suppress (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jw) (Entered: 07/01/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/30/2021 305 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Pursuant to the Court's order of June 25, 2021 (Dkt. No. 303), any proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence must be filed no later than today, June 30, 2021. Any proposed redactions to the other documents ordered unsealed in that order must be filed no later than July 2, 2021. The parties shall file a joint letter by each of these dates informing the Court if no redactions are sought. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/30/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 06/30/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/30/2021 306 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 30, 2021 re: Joint Letter re June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order and Defense Exhibits Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/30/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "07/01/2021 308 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. No party has proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence or the documents ordered unsealed in the Courts June 25, 2021 Order (Dkt. No. 303). Thus, the Court lifts the temporary seal on its June 25, 2021 opinion on Maxwells motions to suppress. It also unseals the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Governments application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application, originally filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Maxwell shall",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020428",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Andrew Rohrbach"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USA",
      "Second Circuit"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/16/2021",
      "06/25/2021",
      "06/30/2021",
      "07/01/2021",
      "07/08/2022",
      "June 7, 2021",
      "April 9, 2019",
      "March 26, 2019",
      "June 30, 2021",
      "July 2, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "1-2",
      "3344417",
      "302",
      "303",
      "304",
      "307",
      "305",
      "306",
      "308",
      "133",
      "139",
      "134",
      "300",
      "15-cv-7433",
      "Dkt. No. 303",
      "Dkt. No. 300",
      "Dkt. Nos. 133, 139",
      "Dkt. No. 134"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include letters, orders, and opinions from the court, as well as documents filed by the parties. The document is well-formatted and easy to read, with clear headings and concise summaries of each entry."
}