mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020540.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "54",
    "document_number": "3-2",
    "date": "07/08/2022",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page54 of 92\n\n10/29/2021 402 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter regarding delivery of Defendant's legal mail at MDC. Dkt. No. 381. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond by Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/29/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/02/2021)\n\n10/31/2021 400 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, Dkt. No. 378, and the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Dkt. No. 386. The issues raised in the two motions overlap significantly. The Court is required under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 to conduct an in camera hearing. Fed. R. Evid. 412 (\"Before admitting evidence under this rule, the court must conduct an in camera hearing and give the victim and parties a right to attend and be heard. Unless the court orders otherwise, the motion, related materials, and the record of the hearing must remain under seal.). In addition, the Court has determined it will conduct a Daubert hearing with respect to the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Because of the overlap in the substance of the motions, the Court will conduct the two proceedings back to back. The Court previously set a tentative date for the Rule 412 Motion hearing as November 5, 2021. Dkt. No. 354. The Court is prepared to proceed with both hearings on that date. Alternatively, the proceedings could be held on either the afternoon of November 9 or the afternoon of November 10. The Government shall confer with its proposed expert regarding availability for the Daubert hearing as well as with alleged victims who wish to attend and be heard at the Rule 412 Motion hearing. After doing so, the parties shall confer with each other as to availability. On or before November 2, 2021, the parties shall jointly file a letter with the Court indicating whether the parties request that the hearings be held on November 5, 9, or 10. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/31/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/01/2021)\n\n11/01/2021 401 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions to the parties' motions in limine, responses in opposition, replies in support, and related exhibits. As the Court indicated at today's conference, some of the parties' proposed redactions are overbroad considering the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In particular, for the reasons stated at today's conference, the Court denies the Government's request to redact section ten of the Government's motion in limine. See Dkt. No. 380. The Court will also not permit redactions pertaining to the general description of evidence or anticipated testimony as such redactions are unnecessary to protect the privacy interests of the individuals implicated. Accordingly, the parties must propose more tailored redactions consistent with the Court's discussion at today's conference. The parties are ORDERED to submit the proposals to the Court via email by November 4, 2021. In order to facilitate the Court's review of the requests, the Court requires the parties to submit the proposed redactions as a single document and with the proposed redactions highlighted. The Defendant's proposed redactions should be highlighted in one color, and the Government's a different color. The Court will rule on the proposed redactions expeditiously. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/1/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/02/2021)\n\n11/01/2021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Pretrial Conference as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 11/1/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Pamela Utter and Michael McDaniel. Pretrial Conference held. Defendant remains remanded. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 11/02/2021)\n\n11/02/2021 403 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 2, 2021 re: Delivery of Legal Mail at MDC Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/02/2021)\n\n11/02/2021 404 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. As discussed at yesterday's conference, attached is the Court's draft preliminary remarks to be recorded and played before each voir dire session. The parties may suggest any proposed edits or additions by letter on or before November 8, 2021, or they shall indicate by that date that they have no objections or suggestions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/2/2021)(bw)\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020540",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page54 of 92",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "10/29/2021 402 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter regarding delivery of Defendant's legal mail at MDC. Dkt. No. 381. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond by Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/29/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/02/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "10/31/2021 400 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, Dkt. No. 378, and the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Dkt. No. 386. The issues raised in the two motions overlap significantly. The Court is required under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 to conduct an in camera hearing. Fed. R. Evid. 412 (\"Before admitting evidence under this rule, the court must conduct an in camera hearing and give the victim and parties a right to attend and be heard. Unless the court orders otherwise, the motion, related materials, and the record of the hearing must remain under seal.). In addition, the Court has determined it will conduct a Daubert hearing with respect to the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Because of the overlap in the substance of the motions, the Court will conduct the two proceedings back to back. The Court previously set a tentative date for the Rule 412 Motion hearing as November 5, 2021. Dkt. No. 354. The Court is prepared to proceed with both hearings on that date. Alternatively, the proceedings could be held on either the afternoon of November 9 or the afternoon of November 10. The Government shall confer with its proposed expert regarding availability for the Daubert hearing as well as with alleged victims who wish to attend and be heard at the Rule 412 Motion hearing. After doing so, the parties shall confer with each other as to availability. On or before November 2, 2021, the parties shall jointly file a letter with the Court indicating whether the parties request that the hearings be held on November 5, 9, or 10. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/31/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/01/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "11/01/2021 401 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions to the parties' motions in limine, responses in opposition, replies in support, and related exhibits. As the Court indicated at today's conference, some of the parties' proposed redactions are overbroad considering the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In particular, for the reasons stated at today's conference, the Court denies the Government's request to redact section ten of the Government's motion in limine. See Dkt. No. 380. The Court will also not permit redactions pertaining to the general description of evidence or anticipated testimony as such redactions are unnecessary to protect the privacy interests of the individuals implicated. Accordingly, the parties must propose more tailored redactions consistent with the Court's discussion at today's conference. The parties are ORDERED to submit the proposals to the Court via email by November 4, 2021. In order to facilitate the Court's review of the requests, the Court requires the parties to submit the proposed redactions as a single document and with the proposed redactions highlighted. The Defendant's proposed redactions should be highlighted in one color, and the Government's a different color. The Court will rule on the proposed redactions expeditiously. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/1/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/02/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "11/01/2021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Pretrial Conference as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 11/1/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Pamela Utter and Michael McDaniel. Pretrial Conference held. Defendant remains remanded. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 11/02/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "11/02/2021 403 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 2, 2021 re: Delivery of Legal Mail at MDC Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/02/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "11/02/2021 404 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. As discussed at yesterday's conference, attached is the Court's draft preliminary remarks to be recorded and played before each voir dire session. The parties may suggest any proposed edits or additions by letter on or before November 8, 2021, or they shall indicate by that date that they have no objections or suggestions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/2/2021)(bw)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020540",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Bobbi Sternheim",
      "Jeff Pagliuca",
      "Christian Everdell",
      "Laura Menninger",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Andrew Rohrbach",
      "Pamela Utter",
      "Michael McDaniel"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "MDC",
      "USA"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/29/2021",
      "10/31/2021",
      "11/01/2021",
      "11/02/2021",
      "07/08/2022",
      "November 2, 2021",
      "November 5, 2021",
      "November 9, 2021",
      "November 10, 2021",
      "November 4, 2021",
      "November 8, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "3-2",
      "3344434",
      "402",
      "400",
      "401",
      "403",
      "404",
      "Dkt. No. 381",
      "Dkt. No. 378",
      "Dkt. No. 386",
      "Dkt. No. 354",
      "Dkt. No. 380",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020540"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or docket sheet from a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}