mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020657.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "39",
    "document_number": "57",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page39 of 208\nA-35\n2/22/23, 1:25 PM\nSDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6\nreference to the test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant, BSF, and the Government are further ORDERED to notify the Court whether any party seeks redactions to the April 19, 2021 joint letter. If not, the Defendant shall file the letter on the public docket by April 23, 2021 (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/21)(jw) (Entered: 04/21/2021)\n04/21/2021 | 227 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 21, 2021 re: in response to the Court's April 19, 2021 Order Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 04/21/2021)\n04/21/2021 | 228 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 225 Letter Grand Jury Motion... ENDORSEMENT: The motion to dismiss the SI superseding indictment on the grounds that it was returned by a grand jury sitting at the White Plains courthouse (Dkt. No. 125) is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/21)(jbo) (Entered: 04/21/2021)\n04/21/2021 | 229 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 21, 2021 re: Proposed Pretrial Schedule Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 04/21/2021)\n04/21/2021 | 230 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated April 21, 2021 re: Proposed Pretrial Schedule (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/21/2021)\n04/21/2021 | 231 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court will schedule a trial date for the severed perjury counts after trial of the non-perjury counts is completed. Given that and in light of the representations in the Government's April 21, 2021 letter, see Dkt. No. 227, the Court intends to defer resolution of the pending motions to suppress (including resolution of the request for an evidentiary hearing) until after the trial on the non-perjury counts. If either side objects, counsel shall state the basis for any objection by letter on or before by 5pm on Thursday, April 22, 2021.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/22/2021)\n04/22/2021 | 232 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 222 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 20, 2021 re: Redactions to Defense Reply Briefs and Exhibits. ENDORSEMENT: The Court grants the Government's proposed redaction and sealing requests. This conclusion is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. The Court concludes that these are judicial documents and that the First Amendment and common law presumptions of access attach. In balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, however, the Court finds that the specific arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995). The Government's letter does not discuss Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6. By April 23, 2021, the parties shall either propose redactions to Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6, which was originally filed under seal, or they shall indicate to the Court that they seek no redactions and file it on ECF. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/22/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/22/2021)\nhttps://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?2110870152221896-L_1_0-1\n35/113\nDOJ-OGR-00020657",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page39 of 208",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-35",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2/22/23, 1:25 PM",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "reference to the test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant, BSF, and the Government are further ORDERED to notify the Court whether any party seeks redactions to the April 19, 2021 joint letter. If not, the Defendant shall file the letter on the public docket by April 23, 2021 (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/21)(jw) (Entered: 04/21/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/21/2021 | 227 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 21, 2021 re: in response to the Court's April 19, 2021 Order Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 04/21/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/21/2021 | 228 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 225 Letter Grand Jury Motion... ENDORSEMENT: The motion to dismiss the SI superseding indictment on the grounds that it was returned by a grand jury sitting at the White Plains courthouse (Dkt. No. 125) is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/21)(jbo) (Entered: 04/21/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/21/2021 | 229 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 21, 2021 re: Proposed Pretrial Schedule Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 04/21/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/21/2021 | 230 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated April 21, 2021 re: Proposed Pretrial Schedule (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/21/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/21/2021 | 231 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court will schedule a trial date for the severed perjury counts after trial of the non-perjury counts is completed. Given that and in light of the representations in the Government's April 21, 2021 letter, see Dkt. No. 227, the Court intends to defer resolution of the pending motions to suppress (including resolution of the request for an evidentiary hearing) until after the trial on the non-perjury counts. If either side objects, counsel shall state the basis for any objection by letter on or before by 5pm on Thursday, April 22, 2021.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/22/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/22/2021 | 232 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 222 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 20, 2021 re: Redactions to Defense Reply Briefs and Exhibits. ENDORSEMENT: The Court grants the Government's proposed redaction and sealing requests. This conclusion is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. The Court concludes that these are judicial documents and that the First Amendment and common law presumptions of access attach. In balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, however, the Court finds that the specific arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995). The Government's letter does not discuss Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6. By April 23, 2021, the parties shall either propose redactions to Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6, which was originally filed under seal, or they shall indicate to the Court that they seek no redactions and file it on ECF. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/22/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/22/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?2110870152221896-L_1_0-1",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "35/113",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020657",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Andrew Rohrbach",
      "Christian R. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USA",
      "BSF",
      "Second Circuit",
      "Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "White Plains courthouse",
      "Onondaga"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023",
      "2/22/23",
      "04/21/2021",
      "April 19, 2021",
      "April 23, 2021",
      "April 20, 2021",
      "April 22, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 57",
      "3475900",
      "Page39 of 208",
      "A-35",
      "227",
      "228",
      "229",
      "230",
      "231",
      "232",
      "225",
      "222",
      "Dkt. No. 125",
      "Dkt. No. 227",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020657"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a record of various filings and orders in a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible."
}