mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020659.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "41",
    "document_number": "57",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page 41 of 208\nA-37\n2/22/23, 1:25 PM\nSDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6\nproposed redactions by April 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/23/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/23/2021)\n04/23/2021 | 242 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On April 22, 2021, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her response to the Court's April 21, 2021 Order, Dkt. No. 221, under temporary seal with proposed redactions. The proposed redactions are GRANTED. The Court's conclusion is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 1120. The Court concludes that these are judicial documents and that the First Amendment and common law presumptions of access attach. In balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, however, the Court finds that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of defense lawyers' clients in other matters and to allow defense counsel to comply with their professional obligations under the rules of professional conduct. The Defendant is ORDERED to docket the redacted version of her letter by April 23, 2021. The Defendant is further ORDERED to docket the basis for the redaction request, originally sent by email, on ECF by April 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/23/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/23/2021)\n04/23/2021 | 243 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 234 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated April 22, 2021 re: Response to Dkt. No. 227, Governments April 21, 2021 Letter re Ms. Maxwell's Motions to Suppress. ENDORSEMENT: The Court agrees with the position set forth in this letter that, unless the Government agrees to forgo any use of the documents subject to the motions to suppress at trial on the non-perjury counts, the Court must resolve those motions prior to that trial. The Court will resolve the motions in due course. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/23/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/23/2021)\n04/23/2021 | 244 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated April 2, 2021 re: Response to Letter Motion to Quash Rule 17 Subpoena to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/23/2021)\n04/23/2021 | 245 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated April 19, 2021 re: Redactions to Pleadings Re: Rule 17 Subpoenas (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 04/23/2021)\n04/23/2021 | 246 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated April 22, 2021 re: 221 Order,,, re: Request for Adjournment of 120 or 180 Days for Trial on the Non-Perjury Counts . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 04/23/2021)\n04/23/2021 | 247 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated April 5, 2021 re: Reply in Support of Objections to Rule 17 Subpoena Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 04/23/2021)\n04/23/2021 |  | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Arraignment as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) Count 1ss,2ss,3ss,4ss,5ss,6ss,7ss-8ss held on 4/23/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz for the government. Defendant is arraigned on Superseding Indictment 2. Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty to the S2 indictment. Defendant remains remanded. See Transcript. (Court Reporter Rebecca Forman) (ap) (Entered: 04/27/2021)\nhttps://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?2110867015221896-L_1_0-1\n37/113\nDOJ-OGR-00020659",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page 41 of 208",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-37",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2/22/23, 1:25 PM",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "proposed redactions by April 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/23/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/23/2021)",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/23/2021 | 242 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On April 22, 2021, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her response to the Court's April 21, 2021 Order, Dkt. No. 221, under temporary seal with proposed redactions. The proposed redactions are GRANTED. The Court's conclusion is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 1120. The Court concludes that these are judicial documents and that the First Amendment and common law presumptions of access attach. In balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, however, the Court finds that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of defense lawyers' clients in other matters and to allow defense counsel to comply with their professional obligations under the rules of professional conduct. The Defendant is ORDERED to docket the redacted version of her letter by April 23, 2021. The Defendant is further ORDERED to docket the basis for the redaction request, originally sent by email, on ECF by April 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/23/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/23/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/23/2021 | 243 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 234 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated April 22, 2021 re: Response to Dkt. No. 227, Governments April 21, 2021 Letter re Ms. Maxwell's Motions to Suppress. ENDORSEMENT: The Court agrees with the position set forth in this letter that, unless the Government agrees to forgo any use of the documents subject to the motions to suppress at trial on the non-perjury counts, the Court must resolve those motions prior to that trial. The Court will resolve the motions in due course. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/23/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/23/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/23/2021 | 244 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated April 2, 2021 re: Response to Letter Motion to Quash Rule 17 Subpoena to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/23/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/23/2021 | 245 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated April 19, 2021 re: Redactions to Pleadings Re: Rule 17 Subpoenas (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 04/23/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/23/2021 | 246 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated April 22, 2021 re: 221 Order,,, re: Request for Adjournment of 120 or 180 Days for Trial on the Non-Perjury Counts . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 04/23/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/23/2021 | 247 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated April 5, 2021 re: Reply in Support of Objections to Rule 17 Subpoena Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 04/23/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/23/2021 |  | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Arraignment as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) Count 1ss,2ss,3ss,4ss,5ss,6ss,7ss-8ss held on 4/23/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz for the government. Defendant is arraigned on Superseding Indictment 2. Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty to the S2 indictment. Defendant remains remanded. See Transcript. (Court Reporter Rebecca Forman) (ap) (Entered: 04/27/2021)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?2110867015221896-L_1_0-1",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "37/113",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020659",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
      "Laura A. Menninger",
      "Sigrid S. McCawley",
      "Bobbi Sternheim",
      "Jeff Pagliuca",
      "Christian Everdell",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Rebecca Forman"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Boies Schiller Flexner LLP",
      "SDNY CM/ECF"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023",
      "04/23/2021",
      "04/22/2021",
      "04/21/2021",
      "04/19/2021",
      "04/5/2021",
      "04/2/2021",
      "2/22/23"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 57",
      "3475900",
      "Page 41 of 208",
      "A-37",
      "242",
      "243",
      "244",
      "245",
      "246",
      "247",
      "Dkt. No. 221",
      "Dkt. No. 227",
      "Dkt. No. 234"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a record of proceedings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes various entries related to the case, including orders, letters, and minute entries. The document is dated February 28, 2023, and is page 41 of 208."
}