DOJ-OGR-00020668.json 11 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "50",
  4. "document_number": "57",
  5. "date": "02/28/2023",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page50 of 208\nA-46\n2/22/23, 1:25 PM\nSDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6\nRules 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) materials (The Government proposed November 1, 2021; the Defendant proposed the close of the Government's case-in-chief) Close of the Government's case-in-chief: Defense witness list and 26.2 statements (Defendant's proposal) These dates establish a baseline for when the parties must disclose certain materials. Each of the parties has a continuing obligation to update all disclosures if they become aware of additional responsive materials. In addition, as requested by the parties, the parties may bring issues to the Court's attention that arise after the deadline for motions in limine if the issues could not have been raised within the deadline set for in limine motions. (Motions due by 10/18/2021. Responses due by 11/1/2021) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/2/2021) (ap) (Entered: 06/02/2021)\n06/04/2021 298 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Defendant's motion for an order authorizing the subpoena pursuant to Rule 17(c)(3) is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/4/2021) (See ORDER set forth) (ap) (Entered: 06/04/2021)\n06/07/2021 299 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 173 Notice of Appeal, 113 Notice of Appeal. USCA Case Number 21-58; 21-770. Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court entered December 28, 2020 and March 22, 2021, which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial. See Dkts. 1, 20. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the District Courts orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellants motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court... Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 6/7/2021. (nd) (Entered: 06/08/2021)\n06/08/2021 Transmission of USCA Mandate to the District Judge re: 299 USCA Mandate. (nd) (Entered: 06/08/2021)\n06/15/2021 300 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 6/15/2021 re: Response to MDC Conditions Update (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 06/15/2021)\n06/15/2021 301 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On June 7, 2021, the Government submitted an update on the Defendants conditions of confinement. It submitted it under temporary seal to permit the Defendant to propose redactions. On June 15, 2021, the Defendant proposed narrowly tailored redactions, which the Court adopts after applying the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Government is ORDERED to publicly docket the redacted version of its June 7, 2021 letter by June 17, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 06/16/2021)\n06/16/2021 302 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 7, 2021 re: MDC Conditions Update Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/16/2021)\n06/25/2021 303 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED. The Court sets out its reasoning in an opinion concurrently filed under temporary seal to allow Maxwell and the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. The parties may file under seal any proposed redactions to the opinion within three days. The Court further ORDERS that the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Government's application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application shall be unsealed. These documents were https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 46/113 DOJ-OGR-00020668",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page50 of 208",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "A-46",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "2/22/23, 1:25 PM",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6",
  30. "position": "header"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Rules 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) materials (The Government proposed November 1, 2021; the Defendant proposed the close of the Government's case-in-chief) Close of the Government's case-in-chief: Defense witness list and 26.2 statements (Defendant's proposal) These dates establish a baseline for when the parties must disclose certain materials. Each of the parties has a continuing obligation to update all disclosures if they become aware of additional responsive materials. In addition, as requested by the parties, the parties may bring issues to the Court's attention that arise after the deadline for motions in limine if the issues could not have been raised within the deadline set for in limine motions. (Motions due by 10/18/2021. Responses due by 11/1/2021) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/2/2021) (ap) (Entered: 06/02/2021)",
  35. "position": "main"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "06/04/2021 298 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Defendant's motion for an order authorizing the subpoena pursuant to Rule 17(c)(3) is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/4/2021) (See ORDER set forth) (ap) (Entered: 06/04/2021)",
  40. "position": "main"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "06/07/2021 299 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 173 Notice of Appeal, 113 Notice of Appeal. USCA Case Number 21-58; 21-770. Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court entered December 28, 2020 and March 22, 2021, which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial. See Dkts. 1, 20. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the District Courts orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellants motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court... Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 6/7/2021. (nd) (Entered: 06/08/2021)",
  45. "position": "main"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "06/08/2021 Transmission of USCA Mandate to the District Judge re: 299 USCA Mandate. (nd) (Entered: 06/08/2021)",
  50. "position": "main"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "06/15/2021 300 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 6/15/2021 re: Response to MDC Conditions Update (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 06/15/2021)",
  55. "position": "main"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "06/15/2021 301 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On June 7, 2021, the Government submitted an update on the Defendants conditions of confinement. It submitted it under temporary seal to permit the Defendant to propose redactions. On June 15, 2021, the Defendant proposed narrowly tailored redactions, which the Court adopts after applying the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Government is ORDERED to publicly docket the redacted version of its June 7, 2021 letter by June 17, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 06/16/2021)",
  60. "position": "main"
  61. },
  62. {
  63. "type": "printed",
  64. "content": "06/16/2021 302 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 7, 2021 re: MDC Conditions Update Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/16/2021)",
  65. "position": "main"
  66. },
  67. {
  68. "type": "printed",
  69. "content": "06/25/2021 303 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED. The Court sets out its reasoning in an opinion concurrently filed under temporary seal to allow Maxwell and the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. The parties may file under seal any proposed redactions to the opinion within three days. The Court further ORDERS that the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Government's application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application shall be unsealed. These documents were",
  70. "position": "main"
  71. }
  72. ],
  73. "entities": {
  74. "people": [
  75. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  76. "Alison J. Nathan",
  77. "Bobbi C. Sternheim",
  78. "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
  79. "Maurene Comey",
  80. "Alison Moe",
  81. "Lara Pomerantz",
  82. "Andrew Rohrbach"
  83. ],
  84. "organizations": [
  85. "USCA",
  86. "USA",
  87. "SDNY"
  88. ],
  89. "locations": [
  90. "Second Circuit"
  91. ],
  92. "dates": [
  93. "November 1, 2021",
  94. "October 18, 2021",
  95. "November 1, 2021",
  96. "June 2, 2021",
  97. "June 4, 2021",
  98. "December 28, 2020",
  99. "March 22, 2021",
  100. "June 7, 2021",
  101. "June 8, 2021",
  102. "June 15, 2021",
  103. "June 16, 2021",
  104. "June 17, 2021",
  105. "June 25, 2021",
  106. "April 9, 2019",
  107. "March 26, 2019"
  108. ],
  109. "reference_numbers": [
  110. "22-1426",
  111. "57",
  112. "3475900",
  113. "208",
  114. "298",
  115. "299",
  116. "300",
  117. "301",
  118. "302",
  119. "303",
  120. "173",
  121. "113",
  122. "21-58",
  123. "21-770",
  124. "1",
  125. "20",
  126. "39",
  127. "133",
  128. "139",
  129. "15-cv-7433"
  130. ]
  131. },
  132. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a record of the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, including various court orders, letters, and other filings. The document is 50 pages into a total of 208 pages."
  133. }