mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020711.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "93",
    "document_number": "57",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page 93 of 208\nA-89\n2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6\ndocket. The Government subsequently submitted one court exhibit with the name unredacted of a witness subject to the Court's anonymity order. Subsequently the Defense indicated in a temporarily sealed letter why the name was unredacted. The Government is accordingly ORDERED to docket a letter on ECF on or before January 28, 2022, indicating why a redaction is no longer being sought for the name of this witness. Once the Government confirms in that letter that it no longer seeks redaction of the name, then the Defense may file the temporarily sealed letter on the docket without redaction of the name. The Court will then docket all Court Exhibits. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/26/22)(jw) (Entered: 01/26/2022)\n01/26/2022 585 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion for a new trial and accompanying exhibits, which she requests to file under seal. See Dkt. No. 580. The Court has also received requests from media organizations to unseal the motion. The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that the First Amendment right to public access is fully safeguarded. At the same time, the Court must act deliberately and hear from the parties in considering these sealing issues in order to ensure the integrity of any potential inquiry process going forward, should one be ordered. That too is in the public, as well as the Defendant's and the Government's, interest. Accordingly, to the extent the Defense requests that arguments in favor of sealing should themselves be sealed, that request is DENIED. Arguments in favor of sealing can be made in such a way so as not to undermine the grounds for seeking sealing or redaction in the first instance. The Defense is therefore ORDERED to file a letter on the public docket on or before February 1, 2022, that justifies the proposed sealing by reference to the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Government may file on ECF a response to the Defenses justification letter on or before February 4, 2022. The Government's opposition to the Defenses new trial motion is due February 2, 2022, Dkt. No. 571. Per the established practice in this case, the Government must provide a copy via email to the Defense to allow the Defense the opportunity to propose narrowly tailored redactions and/or sealing. If either party proposes redactions to or sealing of the Government's anticipated opposition, a letter justifying such redactions or sealing must be filed on the public docket. The Defense letter must be filed on or before February 8, 2022, and the Government letter must be filed by February 11, 2022. The same process will apply for any Defense reply in support, which is due February 9, 2022, Dkt. No. 571. If redactions or sealing are proposed, the Defense letter justifying such requests would be due February 15, 2022, and the Government letter would be due February 18, 2022. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to address the New York Times Company's motion to unseal the filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors. See Dkt. No. 583. Letters by both parties must be submitted via ECF on or before February 11, 2022. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/26/2022)(jw) (Entered: 01/26/2022)\n01/26/2022 586 LETTER addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Matthew A. Leish dated 1/26/2022 re: I write on behalf of Daily News, L.P. (jw) (Entered: 01/26/2022)\n01/27/2022 587 LETTER addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Nathan Siegel dated 1/26/2022 re: Letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on behalf of American Broadcasting Companies, Inc and NBC Universal News Group (jw) (Entered: 01/27/2022)\n01/28/2022 588 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated January 28, 2022 re: Redaction of Witness Name (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 01/28/2022)\n01/28/2022 589 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated 1/28/22 re: Redaction (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 01/28/2022)\nhttps://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?2110870152211896-L_1_0-1 89/113 DOJ-OGR-00020711",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page 93 of 208",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-89",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "docket. The Government subsequently submitted one court exhibit with the name unredacted of a witness subject to the Court's anonymity order. Subsequently the Defense indicated in a temporarily sealed letter why the name was unredacted. The Government is accordingly ORDERED to docket a letter on ECF on or before January 28, 2022, indicating why a redaction is no longer being sought for the name of this witness. Once the Government confirms in that letter that it no longer seeks redaction of the name, then the Defense may file the temporarily sealed letter on the docket without redaction of the name. The Court will then docket all Court Exhibits. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/26/22)(jw) (Entered: 01/26/2022)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "01/26/2022 585 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion for a new trial and accompanying exhibits, which she requests to file under seal. See Dkt. No. 580. The Court has also received requests from media organizations to unseal the motion. The Court is aware there is substantial public interest in this matter and will ensure that the First Amendment right to public access is fully safeguarded. At the same time, the Court must act deliberately and hear from the parties in considering these sealing issues in order to ensure the integrity of any potential inquiry process going forward, should one be ordered. That too is in the public, as well as the Defendant's and the Government's, interest. Accordingly, to the extent the Defense requests that arguments in favor of sealing should themselves be sealed, that request is DENIED. Arguments in favor of sealing can be made in such a way so as not to undermine the grounds for seeking sealing or redaction in the first instance. The Defense is therefore ORDERED to file a letter on the public docket on or before February 1, 2022, that justifies the proposed sealing by reference to the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Government may file on ECF a response to the Defenses justification letter on or before February 4, 2022. The Government's opposition to the Defenses new trial motion is due February 2, 2022, Dkt. No. 571. Per the established practice in this case, the Government must provide a copy via email to the Defense to allow the Defense the opportunity to propose narrowly tailored redactions and/or sealing. If either party proposes redactions to or sealing of the Government's anticipated opposition, a letter justifying such redactions or sealing must be filed on the public docket. The Defense letter must be filed on or before February 8, 2022, and the Government letter must be filed by February 11, 2022. The same process will apply for any Defense reply in support, which is due February 9, 2022, Dkt. No. 571. If redactions or sealing are proposed, the Defense letter justifying such requests would be due February 15, 2022, and the Government letter would be due February 18, 2022. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to address the New York Times Company's motion to unseal the filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors. See Dkt. No. 583. Letters by both parties must be submitted via ECF on or before February 11, 2022. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/26/2022)(jw) (Entered: 01/26/2022)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "01/26/2022 586 LETTER addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Matthew A. Leish dated 1/26/2022 re: I write on behalf of Daily News, L.P. (jw) (Entered: 01/26/2022)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "01/27/2022 587 LETTER addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Nathan Siegel dated 1/26/2022 re: Letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on behalf of American Broadcasting Companies, Inc and NBC Universal News Group (jw) (Entered: 01/27/2022)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "01/28/2022 588 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated January 28, 2022 re: Redaction of Witness Name (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 01/28/2022)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "01/28/2022 589 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated 1/28/22 re: Redaction (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 01/28/2022)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?2110870152211896-L_1_0-1 89/113 DOJ-OGR-00020711",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Matthew A. Leish",
      "Nathan Siegel",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Andrew Rohrbach",
      "Christian R. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Daily News, L.P.",
      "American Broadcasting Companies, Inc",
      "NBC Universal News Group",
      "USA"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "01/26/2022",
      "01/27/2022",
      "01/28/2022",
      "02/01/2022",
      "02/02/2022",
      "02/04/2022",
      "02/08/2022",
      "02/09/2022",
      "02/11/2022",
      "02/15/2022",
      "02/18/2022",
      "02/22/2023",
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "57",
      "3475900",
      "93",
      "208",
      "585",
      "586",
      "587",
      "588",
      "589",
      "580",
      "571",
      "583"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a record of the court's proceedings and includes orders, letters, and other filings related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is dated February 28, 2023, and is page 93 of 208."
}