DOJ-OGR-00020713.json 10 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "95 of 208",
  4. "document_number": "57",
  5. "date": "02/28/2023",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page95 of 208\nA-91\n2/22/23, 1:25 PM\nSDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6\nmotion if: It is timely submitted by February 18, 2022; (Amicus Brief due by 2/18/2022) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/11/22)(jw) (Entered: 02/11/2022)\n02/11/2022 598 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 11, 2022 re: motion by the New York Times Company. Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 02/11/2022)\n02/11/2022 599 MOTION for New Trial to Obtain Relief Requested in Memorandum in Support of Post-Trial Motions. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 02/11/2022)\n02/11/2022 600 MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re 599 MOTION for New Trial to Obtain Relief Requested in Memorandum in Support of Post-Trial Motions.. OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re Post-Trial Motions (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 02/12/2022)\n02/15/2022 601 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 02/15/2022)\n02/16/2022 602 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 02/16/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt. 596 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 02/16/2022)\n02/16/2022 603 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 16, 2022 re: Letter regarding proposed redactions. Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 02/16/2022)\n02/17/2022 604 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. ENDORSEMENT: The request for leave to file an amicus brief in accordance with this Court's February 11, 2022 order is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/17/2022) (lnl) (Entered: 02/17/2022)\n02/18/2022 605 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The parties are hereby ORDERED to re-submit via email revised redactions to the parties' briefing on the Defendant's motion for a new trial by February 22, 2022. The revised proposed redactions shall be consistent with this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/18/2022) (lnl) (Entered: 02/18/2022)\n02/21/2022 606 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 02/21/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt. 605 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 02/21/2022)\n02/24/2022 607 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's proposed redactions revised in response to this Court's order. See Dkt. Nos. 605, 606. The Court has reviewed the proposed redactions and concludes that they are in accordance with its prior orders. See Dkt. Nos. 596, 605. The narrowly tailored redactions further the important interests of helping ensure the integrity of any inquiry and maintaining juror anonymity and privacy. As the Court explained in its February 11 Order, these interests justify redaction of the questions the parties propose be asked at any hearing and specific factual information developed by the parties that has not been publicly reported in the press and that the parties propose be inquired about at any forthcoming hearing. Dkt. No. 596 at 4 (citing United States v. McCoy et al., No. 14 Cr. 6181 (EAW), Dkt. No. 312 (text order) (W.D.N.Y. May 26, 2017); id. Dkt. No. 329 at 38-39; Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty., 464 U.S. 501, 511-12 (1984)). Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to docket the redacted briefs, accompanying exhibits, and their January 13 letters, by February 25, 2022. The Court will docket Juror 50's motion. As noted in its prior Order, following the Court's resolution of the Defendant's motion or a hearing, all https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?2110870152221896-L_1_0-1 91/113 DOJ-OGR-00020713",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page95 of 208",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "A-91",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "2/22/23, 1:25 PM",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6",
  30. "position": "header"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "motion if: It is timely submitted by February 18, 2022; (Amicus Brief due by 2/18/2022) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/11/22)(jw) (Entered: 02/11/2022)",
  35. "position": "body"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "02/11/2022 598 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 11, 2022 re: motion by the New York Times Company. Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 02/11/2022)",
  40. "position": "body"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "02/11/2022 599 MOTION for New Trial to Obtain Relief Requested in Memorandum in Support of Post-Trial Motions. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 02/11/2022)",
  45. "position": "body"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "02/11/2022 600 MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re 599 MOTION for New Trial to Obtain Relief Requested in Memorandum in Support of Post-Trial Motions.. OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re Post-Trial Motions (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 02/12/2022)",
  50. "position": "body"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "02/15/2022 601 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 02/15/2022)",
  55. "position": "body"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "02/16/2022 602 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 02/16/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt. 596 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 02/16/2022)",
  60. "position": "body"
  61. },
  62. {
  63. "type": "printed",
  64. "content": "02/16/2022 603 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 16, 2022 re: Letter regarding proposed redactions. Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 02/16/2022)",
  65. "position": "body"
  66. },
  67. {
  68. "type": "printed",
  69. "content": "02/17/2022 604 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. ENDORSEMENT: The request for leave to file an amicus brief in accordance with this Court's February 11, 2022 order is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/17/2022) (lnl) (Entered: 02/17/2022)",
  70. "position": "body"
  71. },
  72. {
  73. "type": "printed",
  74. "content": "02/18/2022 605 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The parties are hereby ORDERED to re-submit via email revised redactions to the parties' briefing on the Defendant's motion for a new trial by February 22, 2022. The revised proposed redactions shall be consistent with this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/18/2022) (lnl) (Entered: 02/18/2022)",
  75. "position": "body"
  76. },
  77. {
  78. "type": "printed",
  79. "content": "02/21/2022 606 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 02/21/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt. 605 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 02/21/2022)",
  80. "position": "body"
  81. },
  82. {
  83. "type": "printed",
  84. "content": "02/24/2022 607 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's proposed redactions revised in response to this Court's order. See Dkt. Nos. 605, 606. The Court has reviewed the proposed redactions and concludes that they are in accordance with its prior orders. See Dkt. Nos. 596, 605. The narrowly tailored redactions further the important interests of helping ensure the integrity of any inquiry and maintaining juror anonymity and privacy. As the Court explained in its February 11 Order, these interests justify redaction of the questions the parties propose be asked at any hearing and specific factual information developed by the parties that has not been publicly reported in the press and that the parties propose be inquired about at any forthcoming hearing. Dkt. No. 596 at 4 (citing United States v. McCoy et al., No. 14 Cr. 6181 (EAW), Dkt. No. 312 (text order) (W.D.N.Y. May 26, 2017); id. Dkt. No. 329 at 38-39; Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty., 464 U.S. 501, 511-12 (1984)). Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to docket the redacted briefs, accompanying exhibits, and their January 13 letters, by February 25, 2022. The Court will docket Juror 50's motion. As noted in its prior Order, following the Court's resolution of the Defendant's motion or a hearing, all",
  85. "position": "body"
  86. }
  87. ],
  88. "entities": {
  89. "people": [
  90. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  91. "Alison J. Nathan",
  92. "Alison Moe",
  93. "Maurene Comey",
  94. "Lara Pomerantz",
  95. "Andrew Rohrbach",
  96. "Bobbi C Sternheim",
  97. "Christian Everdell",
  98. "McCoy",
  99. "EAW"
  100. ],
  101. "organizations": [
  102. "USA",
  103. "New York Times Company",
  104. "SDNY CM/ECF"
  105. ],
  106. "locations": [
  107. "New York",
  108. "W.D.N.Y.",
  109. "Cal.",
  110. "Riverside Cnty."
  111. ],
  112. "dates": [
  113. "02/11/2022",
  114. "02/15/2022",
  115. "02/16/2022",
  116. "02/17/2022",
  117. "02/18/2022",
  118. "02/21/2022",
  119. "02/24/2022",
  120. "02/22/2022",
  121. "02/25/2022",
  122. "January 13",
  123. "May 26, 2017",
  124. "February 11",
  125. "February 18, 2022"
  126. ],
  127. "reference_numbers": [
  128. "22-1426",
  129. "57",
  130. "3475900",
  131. "598",
  132. "599",
  133. "600",
  134. "601",
  135. "602",
  136. "603",
  137. "604",
  138. "605",
  139. "606",
  140. "607",
  141. "596",
  142. "14 Cr. 6181",
  143. "312",
  144. "329",
  145. "464 U.S. 501"
  146. ]
  147. },
  148. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a record of the filings and orders in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is dated February 28, 2023, and is page 95 of 208."
  149. }