mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020810.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "192",
    "document_number": "57",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "OPINION & ORDER",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page192 of 208\nA-188\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUSDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 8/13/21\nUnited States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.\n20-cr-330 (AJN)\nOPINION & ORDER\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nOn April 16, 2021, the Court issued an Opinion & Order granting in part and denying in part Ghislaine Maxwell's various pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the Government's (S1) superseding indictment and compel discovery. Prior to the issuance of that Opinion & Order but after the motions were fully briefed, a grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment adding a sex trafficking count and sex trafficking conspiracy count. The Court did not address the new charges in the April 16, 2021 Opinion & Order. On May 25, 2021, Maxwell filed another round of pretrial motions seeking to dismiss the S2 indictment in whole or in part and to compel discovery. Dkt. No. 292, 293. For appeal preservation purposes or otherwise, the arguments largely, though not entirely, rehash the positions rejected by the Court in its April 16, 2021 Opinion & Order. To the extent new arguments are made, they are addressed below. All pending motions are DENIED. The Court provides a brief summary of its conclusions here and its reasoning on the pages that follow:\n- Maxwell moves to dismiss counts one, three, five, and six as barred by Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The Court again concludes, as it did in its April 16, 2021 Opinion & Order, that the agreement does not bind the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.\nDOJ-OGR-00020810",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page192 of 208",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-188",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 8/13/21",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: ...",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020810",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court",
      "United States Attorney"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Southern District of New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "April 16, 2021",
      "May 25, 2021",
      "8/13/21",
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-cr-330",
      "Dkt. No. 292, 293",
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 57"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court opinion and order in a high-profile case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is clear and legible, with no apparent redactions or damage."
}