mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020832.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page6 of 221\nA-206\nLCKVMAX8 Charge 3038\n1 the person's actions.\n2 The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt,\n3 however, that a significant or motivating purpose of Jane's\n4 travel across state lines was that she would engage in illegal\n5 sexual activity; in other words, the illegal sexual activity\n6 must not have been merely incidental to the trip.\n7 Instruction No. 22. Count Four. Transportation of an\n8 individual under the age of 17 to engage in illegal sexual\n9 activity. Third element.\n10 The third element of Count Four which the government\n11 must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knew\n12 that Jane was less than 17 years old at the time of the acts\n13 alleged in Count Four of the indictment.\n14 Instruction No. 23. Counts Two and Four. Failure to\n15 accomplish intended activity is immaterial.\n16 Now, with respect to Counts Two and Four, it is not a\n17 defense that the sexual activity which may have been intended\n18 by the defendant was not accomplished. In other words, it's\n19 not necessary for the government to prove that anyone, in fact,\n20 engaged in any sexual activity for which any person can be\n21 charged with a criminal offense with the individual after she\n22 was enticed for Count Two or transported for Count Four across\n23 state lines. It is enough if the defendant has the requisite\n24 intent at the time of the enticement or transportation.\n25 Instruction No. 24. Count Six. Sex trafficking of an\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00020832",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page6 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-206",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCKVMAX8 Charge 3038",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 the person's actions.\n2 The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt,\n3 however, that a significant or motivating purpose of Jane's\n4 travel across state lines was that she would engage in illegal\n5 sexual activity; in other words, the illegal sexual activity\n6 must not have been merely incidental to the trip.\n7 Instruction No. 22. Count Four. Transportation of an\n8 individual under the age of 17 to engage in illegal sexual\n9 activity. Third element.\n10 The third element of Count Four which the government\n11 must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knew\n12 that Jane was less than 17 years old at the time of the acts\n13 alleged in Count Four of the indictment.\n14 Instruction No. 23. Counts Two and Four. Failure to\n15 accomplish intended activity is immaterial.\n16 Now, with respect to Counts Two and Four, it is not a\n17 defense that the sexual activity which may have been intended\n18 by the defendant was not accomplished. In other words, it's\n19 not necessary for the government to prove that anyone, in fact,\n20 engaged in any sexual activity for which any person can be\n21 charged with a criminal offense with the individual after she\n22 was enticed for Count Two or transported for Count Four across\n23 state lines. It is enough if the defendant has the requisite\n24 intent at the time of the enticement or transportation.\n25 Instruction No. 24. Count Six. Sex trafficking of an",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020832",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 58",
      "3475901",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020832"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving sex trafficking and transportation of a minor across state lines. The text is typed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps."
}