mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020836.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "10",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page 10 of 221\nA-210\n3129\nLCRVMAXT\n1 across state lines has to be that Jane engaged in illicit\n2 sexual activity. There is no significant or motivating purpose\n3 of a return trip where Mr. Epstein wasn't present; it's just a\n4 return trip from New Mexico. That would not be a significant\n5 or motivating purpose. She is just presumably going home, but\n6 is not for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual activity.\n7 The testimony, if we are to believe it, is that she\n8 went to New Mexico for some purpose to engage in sexual\n9 activity, that's if you believe Jane's testimony. But\n10 returning from there is not that purpose. Returning is\n11 returning, or it's going somewhere else; it's going somewhere\n12 away from where -- at least in the record, the evidence in the\n13 record, if there is any -- Epstein was presumably in New\n14 Mexico. This is her leaving New Mexico. So I don't think that\n15 qualifies as a significant or motivating purpose. That travel\n16 across state lines is for some other purpose.\n17 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I don't believe this note is\n18 that clear about what flight we're talking about. The note\n19 begins by talking about an unspecified return flight, and then\n20 it turns to talking about a flight to New Mexico. Then there's\n21 a modifying clause about intent. It is unclear which of the\n22 two flights we are now modifying.\n23 I think the safest course here is to refer the jury to\n24 the elements of the crime. I think guessing at what flight\n25 they may be talking about is sort of beyond the reach of this\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00020836",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page 10 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-210",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3129\nLCRVMAXT\n1 across state lines has to be that Jane engaged in illicit\n2 sexual activity. There is no significant or motivating purpose\n3 of a return trip where Mr. Epstein wasn't present; it's just a\n4 return trip from New Mexico. That would not be a significant\n5 or motivating purpose. She is just presumably going home, but\n6 is not for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual activity.\n7 The testimony, if we are to believe it, is that she\n8 went to New Mexico for some purpose to engage in sexual\n9 activity, that's if you believe Jane's testimony. But\n10 returning from there is not that purpose. Returning is\n11 returning, or it's going somewhere else; it's going somewhere\n12 away from where -- at least in the record, the evidence in the\n13 record, if there is any -- Epstein was presumably in New\n14 Mexico. This is her leaving New Mexico. So I don't think that\n15 qualifies as a significant or motivating purpose. That travel\n16 across state lines is for some other purpose.\n17 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I don't believe this note is\n18 that clear about what flight we're talking about. The note\n19 begins by talking about an unspecified return flight, and then\n20 it turns to talking about a flight to New Mexico. Then there's\n21 a modifying clause about intent. It is unclear which of the\n22 two flights we are now modifying.\n23 I think the safest course here is to refer the jury to\n24 the elements of the crime. I think guessing at what flight\n25 they may be talking about is sort of beyond the reach of this",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020836",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "58",
      "3475901",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020836"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}