mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020840.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "14",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page14 of 221\nA-214\n3133\nLCRVMAXT\n1 to New Mexico, where/if there was an intent for Jane to engage\n2 in sexual activity. So there is still an open question in\n3 their minds about whether the flight to New Mexico, that\n4 travel, was for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual\n5 activity.\n6 But they are now considering whether the flight out of\n7 New Mexico, if Ms. Maxwell had any -- did anything to do with\n8 that flight, with arranging that flight, could we convict her\n9 on that count alone. Because there is no, I think, evidence\n10 that she arranged the flight going to New Mexico; instead, they\n11 are considering now whether there's any evidence that she may\n12 have arranged the flight out of New Mexico. And is that enough\n13 to provide a conviction on Count Two? And I think the answer\n14 to that is pretty clearly no -- I'm sorry, Count Four I should\n15 have said, not Count Two. Because there's no evidence of that.\n16 And there is also -- there is no -- in the\n17 instructions themselves, that would not be a significant or\n18 motivating purpose for that travel across state lines. That\n19 would simply be for her to return home. That's not travel for\n20 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity.\n21 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think this colloquy\n22 illustrates how confusing the note is. We are now guessing at\n23 what hypothetical facts the jury is talking about; and then\n24 guessing hypothetically what their legal question is on top of\n25 that. And I think we're compounding guesswork, what this\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00020840",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page14 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-214",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3133\nLCRVMAXT\n1 to New Mexico, where/if there was an intent for Jane to engage\n2 in sexual activity. So there is still an open question in\n3 their minds about whether the flight to New Mexico, that\n4 travel, was for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual\n5 activity.\n6 But they are now considering whether the flight out of\n7 New Mexico, if Ms. Maxwell had any -- did anything to do with\n8 that flight, with arranging that flight, could we convict her\n9 on that count alone. Because there is no, I think, evidence\n10 that she arranged the flight going to New Mexico; instead, they\n11 are considering now whether there's any evidence that she may\n12 have arranged the flight out of New Mexico. And is that enough\n13 to provide a conviction on Count Two? And I think the answer\n14 to that is pretty clearly no -- I'm sorry, Count Four I should\n15 have said, not Count Two. Because there's no evidence of that.\n16 And there is also -- there is no -- in the\n17 instructions themselves, that would not be a significant or\n18 motivating purpose for that travel across state lines. That\n19 would simply be for her to return home. That's not travel for\n20 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity.\n21 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think this colloquy\n22 illustrates how confusing the note is. We are now guessing at\n23 what hypothetical facts the jury is talking about; and then\n24 guessing hypothetically what their legal question is on top of\n25 that. And I think we're compounding guesswork, what this",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020840",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 58",
      "3475901",
      "Count Two",
      "Count Four",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020840"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}