mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020843.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "17",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page17 of 221\nA-217\n3136\nLCRVMAXT\n1       THE COURT: Wow.\n2       MS. MENNINGER: And they are asking, Can we find her\n3   responsible for the return flight, but not that flight to New\n4   Mexico, where the intent was to engage in sexual activity.\n5       That's why I think they have written it with the commas as they\n6   are.\n7       THE COURT: Okay.\n8       MS. MENNINGER: So they have to be directed --\n9       THE COURT: Let me try again. Can I get a yes or a no\n10  to my question? Is it your legal position that the jury must\n11  conclude, in order to convict on this count, that the defendant\n12  had to aid in the transportation of the flight to New Mexico?\n13      MS. MENNINGER: I don't believe that -- no, no, it is\n14  not my contention.\n15      THE COURT: Thank you.\n16      MS. MENNINGER: And the reason is the indictment does\n17  not specify New Mexico. It could be a flight to New York, for\n18  example. It could be a flight to New Mexico. It could be any\n19  place, the purpose for which was to engage in illegal sexual\n20  activity. So it doesn't have to be to New Mexico.\n21      THE COURT: I agree with that.\n22      This is why it's difficult to parse the question\n23  without assuming a variety of meanings, and I'm trying to track\n24  your comma argument.\n25      MS. MENNINGER: Had they placed the comma after New\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00020843",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page17 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3136\nLCRVMAXT",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1       THE COURT: Wow.\n2       MS. MENNINGER: And they are asking, Can we find her\n3   responsible for the return flight, but not that flight to New\n4   Mexico, where the intent was to engage in sexual activity.\n5       That's why I think they have written it with the commas as they\n6   are.\n7       THE COURT: Okay.\n8       MS. MENNINGER: So they have to be directed --\n9       THE COURT: Let me try again. Can I get a yes or a no\n10  to my question? Is it your legal position that the jury must\n11  conclude, in order to convict on this count, that the defendant\n12  had to aid in the transportation of the flight to New Mexico?\n13      MS. MENNINGER: I don't believe that -- no, no, it is\n14  not my contention.\n15      THE COURT: Thank you.\n16      MS. MENNINGER: And the reason is the indictment does\n17  not specify New Mexico. It could be a flight to New York, for\n18  example. It could be a flight to New Mexico. It could be any\n19  place, the purpose for which was to engage in illegal sexual\n20  activity. So it doesn't have to be to New Mexico.\n21      THE COURT: I agree with that.\n22      This is why it's difficult to parse the question\n23  without assuming a variety of meanings, and I'm trying to track\n24  your comma argument.\n25      MS. MENNINGER: Had they placed the comma after New",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020843",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Mexico",
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "58",
      "3475901",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020843"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the court and MS. MENNINGER about the interpretation of a legal document and the placement of commas. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}