mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020902.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "76",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page76 of 221\nA-276\n\n26\nM3BTMAX1\n1   questions. Do you recall that?\n2   A. Yes, your Honor.\n3   Q. So if you had filled out your questionnaire accurately as\n4   evidence presented at trial and my Instructions as to the law?\n5   A. Yeah. No, your Honor, I would be able to review the\n6   evidence based solely on the evidence, and if you\n7   Q. Okay. At the time I asked you questions, did you believe there's anything about\n8   your experience with prior sexual abuse that would interfere\n9   with your ability to assess the credibility of witnesses\n10  alleging sexual abuse?\n11  A. Absolutely in no way.\n12  Q. So at the time did you believe that you would be able to\n13  conclude that a witness alleging sexual abuse was not\n14  testifying truthfully, if that was what the evidence suggested?\n15  A. Correct, your Honor, yes, I did.\n16  Q. At the time I asked you questions on November 16, did you\n17  harbor any bias against Ms. Maxwell?\n18  A. Not at all.\n19  Q. At the time I asked you questions on November 16, were you\n20  biased in favor of the government or with\n21  the prosecution?\n22  Q. Did you want to put your thumb on the scale in any\n23  direction?\n24  A. No.\n25  Q. At the time I asked you questions, and in light of your\n  experience with sexual abuse, did you believe that this subject:\n\n1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25\n\n25\nM3BTMAX1\n1   questions. Do you recall that?\n2   A. Yes, your Honor.\n3   Q. So if you had filled out your questionnaire accurately as\n4   evidence presented at trial and my Instructions as to the law?\n5   A. Yeah. No, your Honor, I would be able to review the\n6   evidence based solely on the evidence, and if you\n7   Q. Okay. At the time I asked you questions, did you believe there's anything about\n8   your experience with prior sexual abuse that would interfere\n9   with your ability to assess the credibility of witnesses\n10  alleging sexual abuse?\n11  A. Absolutely in no way.\n12  Q. So at the time did you believe that you would be able to\n13  conclude that a witness alleging sexual abuse was not\n14  testifying truthfully, if that was what the evidence suggested?\n15  A. Correct, your Honor, yes, I did.\n16  Q. At the time I asked you questions on November 16, did you\n17  harbor any bias against Ms. Maxwell?\n18  A. Not at all.\n19  Q. At the time I asked you questions on November 16, were you\n20  biased in favor of the government or with\n21  the prosecution?\n22  Q. Did you want to put your thumb on the scale in any\n23  direction?\n24  A. No.\n25  Q. At the time I asked you questions, and in light of your\n  experience with sexual abuse, did you believe that this subject:\n\n1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020902",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page76 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-276",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020902",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023",
      "November 16"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 58",
      "3475901",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020902"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure of questions and answers. The text is mostly legible, with some minor formatting issues. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}