mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020908.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "82",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page82 of 221\nA-282\n38\nM38MAX1\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\nrightly understands that question to be referring to whether he would be a courtroom like this-\nwould understand he would be sitting in when talking to get an\nTHE COURT:\nI will gp back and\nthe understanding of what he thought would happen regarding his own history being\nMS. STERNHEIM:\npublicly known that he was someone who suffered from sexual abuse.\n6\nDuring the interview he mentioned a friend asking about you, \"it turned\nquestion 48, and he said: \"I recall being asked about family, and she said 'it beet red, and family, and she said 'it turned beet red.' He said:\nYou're turning my head on the\nShe actually said it in the papers.\nYou're not on the stand.\nNot in the sun, she said,\nMR. EVANDELL:\nYou're not on the stand, don't worry, but yes.\nTHE COURT:\nMS. STERNHEIM:\nWhat was going through his mind when you're not on the stand?\nShe mentioned that the question included talking about the\nfirst time he learned that the questionnaire had the question is: What was his\nMS. STERNHEIM:\nmotivation in speaking to the press and being interviewed?\nThose questions, what motivated him after\nTHE COURT:\nduring the filing trial, is not relevant to what was going on\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n37\nM38MAX1\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\nfurther questions about his understanding about sort of the\nmagnitude of press coverage arising from the issue that gives\nrise to this hearing, which I believe he touched on as well.\nTHE COURT:\nI think what I will do is go back and ask\nDid you understand at the time you talked to the press in the\nway that you did, did you understand that it would be publicly\nknown that you were a victim of sexual abuse? We'll see what\nhe says.\nMS. MCGINLEY:\nI think about the consequences of talking to the\npress about that?\nIt's difficult for me to see what it's going at, but I\nwill seek clarification or his answers, as I did multiple\ntimes, on the reconciling and understanding his thinking about\ncoming out publicly as a victim of sexual abuse.\nHe has explained some of the transformation process and the like.\nYou\ncan make your arguments about credibility.\nBut I will go back and see if there's something regarding talking to the\nreporter about the consequences. Which also is a temporal\nissue here, he didn't think about it until he talked to the\npress, and in the course of that the press talked to him about\nthe consequences and that changed his understanding\npotentially.\nMS. MCGINLEY:\nYes, your Honor. And I think yet a third\npoint, talking about consequences today, I think Juror 50\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00020908",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page82 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-282",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "38\nM38MAX1\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\nrightly understands that question to be referring to whether he would be a courtroom like this-\nwould understand he would be sitting in when talking to get an\nTHE COURT:\nI will gp back and\nthe understanding of what he thought would happen regarding his own history being\nMS. STERNHEIM:\npublicly known that he was someone who suffered from sexual abuse.\n6\nDuring the interview he mentioned a friend asking about you, \"it turned\nquestion 48, and he said: \"I recall being asked about family, and she said 'it beet red, and family, and she said 'it turned beet red.' He said:\nYou're turning my head on the\nShe actually said it in the papers.\nYou're not on the stand.\nNot in the sun, she said,\nMR. EVANDELL:\nYou're not on the stand, don't worry, but yes.\nTHE COURT:\nMS. STERNHEIM:\nWhat was going through his mind when you're not on the stand?\nShe mentioned that the question included talking about the\nfirst time he learned that the questionnaire had the question is: What was his\nMS. STERNHEIM:\nmotivation in speaking to the press and being interviewed?\nThose questions, what motivated him after\nTHE COURT:\nduring the filing trial, is not relevant to what was going on\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "37\nM38MAX1\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\nfurther questions about his understanding about sort of the\nmagnitude of press coverage arising from the issue that gives\nrise to this hearing, which I believe he touched on as well.\nTHE COURT:\nI think what I will do is go back and ask\nDid you understand at the time you talked to the press in the\nway that you did, did you understand that it would be publicly\nknown that you were a victim of sexual abuse? We'll see what\nhe says.\nMS. MCGINLEY:\nI think about the consequences of talking to the\npress about that?\nIt's difficult for me to see what it's going at, but I\nwill seek clarification or his answers, as I did multiple\ntimes, on the reconciling and understanding his thinking about\ncoming out publicly as a victim of sexual abuse.\nHe has explained some of the transformation process and the like.\nYou\ncan make your arguments about credibility.\nBut I will go back and see if there's something regarding talking to the\nreporter about the consequences. Which also is a temporal\nissue here, he didn't think about it until he talked to the\npress, and in the course of that the press talked to him about\nthe consequences and that changed his understanding\npotentially.\nMS. MCGINLEY:\nYes, your Honor. And I think yet a third\npoint, talking about consequences today, I think Juror 50\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020908",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MR. EVANDELL",
      "MS. MCGINLEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 58",
      "3475901",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020908"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some minor formatting issues. The text is mostly clear and legible."
}