mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021104.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "57",
    "document_number": "59",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "legal document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page57 of 113\n\n18 U.S.C. § 3283. Congress enacted the predecessor to this provision under the Crime Control Act of 1990, Pub.L. 101-647, 104 Stat. 4789, and codified it as § 3283 under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub.L. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796, commonly known as the “1994 Crime Bill.” As promulgated in the 1994 Crime Bill, this section provided that the statute of limitations for an “offense involving the sexual or physical abuse of a child” would expire once the alleged victim “reaches the age of 25 years.” 108 Stat. 2149. But it was not until 2003 that Congress amended § 3283 to provide for a limitations period running for the entire life of the alleged victim. See PROTECT Act, Pub.L. 108-21, § 220, 117 Stat. 650, 660.9 The PROTECT Act was signed into law on April 30, 2003.\n\nContrary to what the Government argued below and what the District Court held, §3283 cannot salvage Counts Three and Four for two separate and independent reasons. First, §3283 does not extend the statute of limitations for violations of § 2423(a), or conspiracy to do the same, because the “sexual or physical abuse…of a child” is not a necessary element of those offenses. Second, the Government cannot apply the 2003 amendment to § 3283—the statute of limitations for the lifetime of one’s accuser—to offenses that the Government alleges were committed before the enactment of this provision. See Landgraf v.\n\n9 Congress amended § 3283 again in 2006. The Government does not contend that that amendment is relevant here.\n\n42\nDOJ-OGR-00021104",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page57 of 113",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "18 U.S.C. § 3283. Congress enacted the predecessor to this provision under the Crime Control Act of 1990, Pub.L. 101-647, 104 Stat. 4789, and codified it as § 3283 under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub.L. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796, commonly known as the “1994 Crime Bill.” As promulgated in the 1994 Crime Bill, this section provided that the statute of limitations for an “offense involving the sexual or physical abuse of a child” would expire once the alleged victim “reaches the age of 25 years.” 108 Stat. 2149. But it was not until 2003 that Congress amended § 3283 to provide for a limitations period running for the entire life of the alleged victim. See PROTECT Act, Pub.L. 108-21, § 220, 117 Stat. 650, 660.9 The PROTECT Act was signed into law on April 30, 2003.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Contrary to what the Government argued below and what the District Court held, §3283 cannot salvage Counts Three and Four for two separate and independent reasons. First, §3283 does not extend the statute of limitations for violations of § 2423(a), or conspiracy to do the same, because the “sexual or physical abuse…of a child” is not a necessary element of those offenses. Second, the Government cannot apply the 2003 amendment to § 3283—the statute of limitations for the lifetime of one’s accuser—to offenses that the Government alleges were committed before the enactment of this provision. See Landgraf v.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9 Congress amended § 3283 again in 2006. The Government does not contend that that amendment is relevant here.",
      "position": "footnote"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "42",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021104",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Congress",
      "Government",
      "District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "1990",
      "1994",
      "2003",
      "2006",
      "02/28/2023",
      "April 30, 2003"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "18 U.S.C. § 3283",
      "Pub.L. 101-647",
      "Pub.L. 103-322",
      "Pub.L. 108-21",
      "§ 220",
      "§ 2423(a)",
      "§ 3283",
      "104 Stat. 4789",
      "108 Stat. 1796",
      "108 Stat. 2149",
      "117 Stat. 650",
      "117 Stat. 660",
      "3475902",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021104"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a legal brief or court document discussing the statute of limitations for certain crimes involving child abuse. The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The footer contains a page number and a reference number."
}