mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021584.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "154",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "legal document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page154 of 217\nSA-408\n\nM6SQmax1\n39\n1    Epstein's house after November 2004 before she turned 18.\n2    Message pads entered at trial show contact only before\n3    November 1.\n4        The government's reliance on two additional pads that\n5    were not entered into evidence doesn't change my analysis. The\n6    first message GX-4B, it's undated, and the context does not\n7    give sufficient confidence that it came after November 1. The\n8    other message pad is dated March 1, 2005, which falls outside\n9    the scope of the conspiracy alleged in the indictment, and\n10   after Carolyn turned 18. Because I cannot on this record find\n11   by a preponderance of the evidence that the offense continued\n12   during that two-month window after November 1, 2004, and before\n13   early 2005, I must apply the 2003 guidelines. Because I find\n14   that the date of the offense was not after November 1, 2004, I\n15   do not address the defendant's alternative argument that a jury\n16   must decide if the 2004 Guidelines apply.\n17       Within the Guidelines themselves, the defendant\n18   objects to the application of three enhancements in the PSR.\n19   She takes issue first with 4B1.5(b). The enhancement\n20   statements that the offense level is increased by five if:\n21   One, the offense of conviction is a covered sex crime; two,\n22   4B1.5(a) for prior convictions does not apply; three, the\n23   defendant engaged in a pattern of activity involving prohibited\n24   sexual conduct. All three requirements are met: The defendant\n25   was convicted of a covered sex crime; she was not previously\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00021584",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page154 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-408",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1\n39\n1    Epstein's house after November 2004 before she turned 18.\n2    Message pads entered at trial show contact only before\n3    November 1.\n4        The government's reliance on two additional pads that\n5    were not entered into evidence doesn't change my analysis. The\n6    first message GX-4B, it's undated, and the context does not\n7    give sufficient confidence that it came after November 1. The\n8    other message pad is dated March 1, 2005, which falls outside\n9    the scope of the conspiracy alleged in the indictment, and\n10   after Carolyn turned 18. Because I cannot on this record find\n11   by a preponderance of the evidence that the offense continued\n12   during that two-month window after November 1, 2004, and before\n13   early 2005, I must apply the 2003 guidelines. Because I find\n14   that the date of the offense was not after November 1, 2004, I\n15   do not address the defendant's alternative argument that a jury\n16   must decide if the 2004 Guidelines apply.\n17       Within the Guidelines themselves, the defendant\n18   objects to the application of three enhancements in the PSR.\n19   She takes issue first with 4B1.5(b). The enhancement\n20   statements that the offense level is increased by five if:\n21   One, the offense of conviction is a covered sex crime; two,\n22   4B1.5(a) for prior convictions does not apply; three, the\n23   defendant engaged in a pattern of activity involving prohibited\n24   sexual conduct. All three requirements are met: The defendant\n25   was convicted of a covered sex crime; she was not previously",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021584",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Carolyn",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "November 2004",
      "November 1, 2004",
      "March 1, 2005",
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "SA-408",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021584"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a legal document, likely a court transcript or a sentencing memorandum. The text is typed, and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document contains references to specific guidelines and legal codes."
}