mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021596.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "166",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page166 of 217\n\nM6SQmax1 51\n1 addressing the factual objections speak directly to this issue.\n2 The record at trial amply established that Melissa and Virginia\n3 were victims of this conspiracy, and that the defendant had\n4 been involved with recruiting Virginia, who in turn recruited\n5 Carolyn, who in turn recruited Melissa.\n6 With respect to Melissa in particular, we would not\n7 that, like Virginia, her name appears in the defendant's little\n8 black book, noting that she's a friend of Carolyn's. For all\n9 those reasons, and the reasons in our brief, we think the trial\n10 record amply establishes that they were both victims of the\n11 conspiracy.\n12 THE COURT: I agree with that, and for the reasons\n13 indicated, do -- I agree with the government's objection to the\n14 probation calculation for that reason.\n15 I think that means we don't need to resolve the\n16 factual objections that pertain to Carolyn's age. As I said, I\n17 credit Carolyn's testimony. The objections I would overrule\n18 because I think she accurately testified regarding her age both\n19 in 2004 and 2005, but it doesn't answer the question, as I see\n20 it, the legal question as to establishment of acts\n21 conspiratorial conduct in the relevant two-month period.\n22 With respect to fines, Mr. Everdell, what is now\n23 paragraph 172 of the revised report, the defendant objects to\n24 the inclusion a $10 million bequest from Epstein being included\n25 in her assets for purposes of determining her ability to pay a\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021596",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page166 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1 51\n1 addressing the factual objections speak directly to this issue.\n2 The record at trial amply established that Melissa and Virginia\n3 were victims of this conspiracy, and that the defendant had\n4 been involved with recruiting Virginia, who in turn recruited\n5 Carolyn, who in turn recruited Melissa.\n6 With respect to Melissa in particular, we would not\n7 that, like Virginia, her name appears in the defendant's little\n8 black book, noting that she's a friend of Carolyn's. For all\n9 those reasons, and the reasons in our brief, we think the trial\n10 record amply establishes that they were both victims of the\n11 conspiracy.\n12 THE COURT: I agree with that, and for the reasons\n13 indicated, do -- I agree with the government's objection to the\n14 probation calculation for that reason.\n15 I think that means we don't need to resolve the\n16 factual objections that pertain to Carolyn's age. As I said, I\n17 credit Carolyn's testimony. The objections I would overrule\n18 because I think she accurately testified regarding her age both\n19 in 2004 and 2005, but it doesn't answer the question, as I see\n20 it, the legal question as to establishment of acts\n21 conspiratorial conduct in the relevant two-month period.\n22 With respect to fines, Mr. Everdell, what is now\n23 paragraph 172 of the revised report, the defendant objects to\n24 the inclusion a $10 million bequest from Epstein being included\n25 in her assets for purposes of determining her ability to pay a",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021596",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Melissa",
      "Virginia",
      "Carolyn",
      "Epstein",
      "Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2004",
      "2005",
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "78",
      "3536039",
      "172",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021596"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}