mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021604.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "174",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page174 of 217\nSA-428\n\nM6SQmaxS1 59\n1 crimes. She has not owned up to the truth. She has lied\n2 repeatedly. She has been dishonest with the Court, and she has\n3 made misrepresentations when it suits her. Your Honor, we\n4 recognize that the Court has calculated the guidelines to be\n5 188 to 235 months. That is far below the sentence that the\n6 government believes is appropriate in this case. We recognize\n7 that there are a small number of cases where the Court imposes\n8 an above-guideline sentence. This is that case, your Honor.\n9 In the almost 20 years since the 2003 manual was enacted, our Sentencing Commission, our Congress, and our\n10 country have all recognized just how serious sex crimes against\n11 children are. Our country now recognizes how woefully\n12 inadequate the 2003 guidelines were, and the Supreme Court has\n13 expressly held that sentencing courts can vary upwards for\n14 exactly that reason. Again, this is that case. This is\n15 exactly that case. This is the time to impose an\n16 above-guideline sentence. A guideline sentence in this case\n17 would create unwarranted sentencing disparities with\n18 individuals being sentenced today for sex-trafficking offenses.\n19 This case calls out for an above-guideline sentence because of\n20 the breathtaking scope of the defendant's conduct, the length\n21 of her crimes, the number of victims, the vulnerability of her\n22 victims, the sophistication of the defendant's predatory\n23 conduct and the degree to which she psychologically manipulated\n24 her victims. Her conduct was shockingly predatory, and it\n25 her victims.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021604",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page174 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-428",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmaxS1 59",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 crimes. She has not owned up to the truth. She has lied\n2 repeatedly. She has been dishonest with the Court, and she has\n3 made misrepresentations when it suits her. Your Honor, we\n4 recognize that the Court has calculated the guidelines to be\n5 188 to 235 months. That is far below the sentence that the\n6 government believes is appropriate in this case. We recognize\n7 that there are a small number of cases where the Court imposes\n8 an above-guideline sentence. This is that case, your Honor.\n9 In the almost 20 years since the 2003 manual was enacted, our Sentencing Commission, our Congress, and our\n10 country have all recognized just how serious sex crimes against\n11 children are. Our country now recognizes how woefully\n12 inadequate the 2003 guidelines were, and the Supreme Court has\n13 expressly held that sentencing courts can vary upwards for\n14 exactly that reason. Again, this is that case. This is\n15 exactly that case. This is the time to impose an\n16 above-guideline sentence. A guideline sentence in this case\n17 would create unwarranted sentencing disparities with\n18 individuals being sentenced today for sex-trafficking offenses.\n19 This case calls out for an above-guideline sentence because of\n20 the breathtaking scope of the defendant's conduct, the length\n21 of her crimes, the number of victims, the vulnerability of her\n22 victims, the sophistication of the defendant's predatory\n23 conduct and the degree to which she psychologically manipulated\n24 her victims. Her conduct was shockingly predatory, and it\n25 her victims.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021604",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Sentencing Commission",
      "Congress",
      "Supreme Court",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023",
      "2003"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021604"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving sex crimes against children. The text is typed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps."
}