mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021638.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "208",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page208 of 217\nSA-462\n93\nM6s2Max2\ndeterrence and just punishment as well. All of these factors suggest that a very serious, a very significant sentence is necessary to achieve the purposes of punishment that I have just described.\nOf course I must, and I do, take into account the history and characteristics of the defendant. Ms. Maxwell is over 60 years old. This is her first conviction. Neither in arguing for pretrial detention nor with respect to sentencing has the government contended that Ms. Maxwell represents a continuing danger to the public. As I explained, I do not need to find she is a continuing danger to apply 4B1.5(b), as her decade-long pattern of predatory activity amply justifies that enhancement and a substantial sentence, but her present lack of dangerousness is a factor in my consideration of a proper sentence.\nHer sentencing submission letters and psychological report discuss the impacts of an overbearing and demanding father and the tragic death of her brother at the beginning of her life. The record indicates that she has engaged in some charitable works, including environmental conservation and health-related charitable organizing and giving. The set of letters I received from her family members and friends describe her as attentive and loving to her family and a loyal and generous friend. A letter from an inmate describes her tutoring of other inmates while incarcerated and Ms. Sternheim\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021638",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page208 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-462\n93\nM6s2Max2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "deterrence and just punishment as well. All of these factors suggest that a very serious, a very significant sentence is necessary to achieve the purposes of punishment that I have just described.\nOf course I must, and I do, take into account the history and characteristics of the defendant. Ms. Maxwell is over 60 years old. This is her first conviction. Neither in arguing for pretrial detention nor with respect to sentencing has the government contended that Ms. Maxwell represents a continuing danger to the public. As I explained, I do not need to find she is a continuing danger to apply 4B1.5(b), as her decade-long pattern of predatory activity amply justifies that enhancement and a substantial sentence, but her present lack of dangerousness is a factor in my consideration of a proper sentence.\nHer sentencing submission letters and psychological report discuss the impacts of an overbearing and demanding father and the tragic death of her brother at the beginning of her life. The record indicates that she has engaged in some charitable works, including environmental conservation and health-related charitable organizing and giving. The set of letters I received from her family members and friends describe her as attentive and loving to her family and a loyal and generous friend. A letter from an inmate describes her tutoring of other inmates while incarcerated and Ms. Sternheim",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021638",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021638"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or sentencing document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name and contact information of the court reporters."
}