mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021639.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "209 of 217",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page209 of 217\nSA-463\nM6s2Max2\n94\n1 represents that she has heard similarly from other defense counsel. I take all of these factors into account consistent\n2 with the 3553(a) statutory provision when deciding what sentence to impose.\n3\n4 Beyond these factors, much of the defense written submission, not the oral statement today, but much of the written\n5 submission focused on a series of complaints about Ms. Maxwell's pretrial detention. As I have said in many sentencing\n6 proceedings since the pandemic began, the conditions in the MDC have been extremely difficult for all inmates as a result.\n7 There have been extended periods of lockdown, health risks, and the lack of access to legal and social visits and programming\n8 and the like. Conditions at the MDC are, to put it mildly, not what they should be, and serving time during the pandemic has\n9 been more difficult than serving time before it. As I have in other sentencings, I take into account this in imposing an\n10 appropriate sentence. I also take into account that, as a high-profile defendant charged and convict of sex offenses against\n11 minors, Ms. Maxwell faces security risks and has endured additional isolation and surveillance beyond the typical pretrial\n12 detainee.\n13 That said, I largely reject the defense's primary written contention that Ms. Maxwell has been singled out for uniquely harsh\n14 and punishing treatment. To the contrary, I agree with the government that many of the complaints have been\n15\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021639",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page209 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-463\nM6s2Max2\n94",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 represents that she has heard similarly from other defense counsel. I take all of these factors into account consistent\n2 with the 3553(a) statutory provision when deciding what sentence to impose.\n3\n4 Beyond these factors, much of the defense written submission, not the oral statement today, but much of the written\n5 submission focused on a series of complaints about Ms. Maxwell's pretrial detention. As I have said in many sentencing\n6 proceedings since the pandemic began, the conditions in the MDC have been extremely difficult for all inmates as a result.\n7 There have been extended periods of lockdown, health risks, and the lack of access to legal and social visits and programming\n8 and the like. Conditions at the MDC are, to put it mildly, not what they should be, and serving time during the pandemic has\n9 been more difficult than serving time before it. As I have in other sentencings, I take into account this in imposing an\n10 appropriate sentence. I also take into account that, as a high-profile defendant charged and convict of sex offenses against\n11 minors, Ms. Maxwell faces security risks and has endured additional isolation and surveillance beyond the typical pretrial\n12 detainee.\n13 That said, I largely reject the defense's primary written contention that Ms. Maxwell has been singled out for uniquely harsh\n14 and punishing treatment. To the contrary, I agree with the government that many of the complaints have been",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021639",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "MDC"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021639"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or sentencing document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is from the Southern District Reporters, P.C. and includes a reference number and contact information."
}