mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021649.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "79",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "Table of Contents",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page2 of 93\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\nPAGE\nPreliminary Statement ............................................... 1\nStatement of Facts ....................................................... 2\nA. The Government's Case ............................................... 2\n1. Sexual Abuse of Jane................................................ 6\n2. Sexual Abuse of Kate................................................ 7\n3. Sexual Abuse of Annie Farmer...................................... 8\n4. Sexual Abuse of Virginia Roberts.................................. 9\n5. Sexual Abuse of Carolyn ............................................ 10\n6. Sexual Abuse of Melissa ............................................. 12\nB. The Defense Case, Verdict, and Sentencing........................... 12\nARGUMENT:\nPoint I—The District Court Correctly Concluded That Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Does Not Bar Maxwell's Prosecution in the Southern District of New York ........ 13\nA. Relevant Facts ....................................................... 14\nB. Applicable Law ....................................................... 15\nC. Discussion ............................................................. 16\n1. Maxwell Is Not Entitled to Enforce the NPA....................... 17\nDOJ-OGR-00021649",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PAGE",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Preliminary Statement ............................................... 1\nStatement of Facts ....................................................... 2\nA. The Government's Case ............................................... 2\n1. Sexual Abuse of Jane................................................ 6\n2. Sexual Abuse of Kate................................................ 7\n3. Sexual Abuse of Annie Farmer...................................... 8\n4. Sexual Abuse of Virginia Roberts.................................. 9\n5. Sexual Abuse of Carolyn ............................................ 10\n6. Sexual Abuse of Melissa ............................................. 12\nB. The Defense Case, Verdict, and Sentencing........................... 12\nARGUMENT:\nPoint I—The District Court Correctly Concluded That Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Does Not Bar Maxwell's Prosecution in the Southern District of New York ........ 13\nA. Relevant Facts ....................................................... 14\nB. Applicable Law ....................................................... 15\nC. Discussion ............................................................. 16\n1. Maxwell Is Not Entitled to Enforce the NPA....................... 17",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021649",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Kate",
      "Annie Farmer",
      "Virginia Roberts",
      "Carolyn",
      "Melissa",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "Southern District of New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "79",
      "3536060",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021649"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of contents for a legal document related to the case of Maxwell, likely Ghislaine Maxwell, who was associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The document is well-formatted and clear, with no visible redactions or damage."
}