DOJ-OGR-00021656.json 3.8 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "9",
  4. "document_number": "79",
  5. "date": "06/29/2023",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page9 of 93\nviii\nPAGE\nUnited States v. Khalupsky,\n5 F.4th 279 (2d Cir. 2021) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70, 71\nUnited States v. Kim,\n471 F. App'x 82 (2d Cir. 2012) . . . . . . . . . . . . 73\nUnited States v. Langford,\n990 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1993) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60\nUnited States v. Lebedev,\n932 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2019) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70, 75\nUnited States v. Lopez,\n944 F.2d 33 (1st Cir. 1991). . . . . . . . . . . . . 17\nUnited States v. Mariamma Viju,\nNo. 15 Cr. 240,\n2016 WL 107841 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2016). . . . . 17\nUnited States v. McCourty,\n562 F.3d 458 (2d Cir. 2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . 56\nUnited States v. McCoy,\n995 F.3d 32 (2d Cir. 2021) . . . . . . . . . . . . 60\nUnited States v. Miller,\n911 F.3d 638 (1st Cir. 2018). . . . . . . . . . . . 39\nUnited States v. Monaco,\n194 F.3d 381 (2d Cir. 1999) . . . . . . . . . . . . 32\nUnited States v. Montague,\n67 F.4th 520 (2d Cir. 2023) . . . . . . . . . . . . 16\nUnited States v. Morgan,\n393 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 2004). . . . . . . . . . . . 48\nDOJ-OGR-00021656",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page9 of 93",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "viii\nPAGE",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "United States v. Khalupsky,\n5 F.4th 279 (2d Cir. 2021) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70, 71\nUnited States v. Kim,\n471 F. App'x 82 (2d Cir. 2012) . . . . . . . . . . . . 73\nUnited States v. Langford,\n990 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1993) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60\nUnited States v. Lebedev,\n932 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2019) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70, 75\nUnited States v. Lopez,\n944 F.2d 33 (1st Cir. 1991). . . . . . . . . . . . . 17\nUnited States v. Mariamma Viju,\nNo. 15 Cr. 240,\n2016 WL 107841 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2016). . . . . 17\nUnited States v. McCourty,\n562 F.3d 458 (2d Cir. 2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . 56\nUnited States v. McCoy,\n995 F.3d 32 (2d Cir. 2021) . . . . . . . . . . . . 60\nUnited States v. Miller,\n911 F.3d 638 (1st Cir. 2018). . . . . . . . . . . . 39\nUnited States v. Monaco,\n194 F.3d 381 (2d Cir. 1999) . . . . . . . . . . . . 32\nUnited States v. Montague,\n67 F.4th 520 (2d Cir. 2023) . . . . . . . . . . . . 16\nUnited States v. Morgan,\n393 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 2004). . . . . . . . . . . . 48",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021656",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Khalupsky",
  36. "Kim",
  37. "Langford",
  38. "Lebedev",
  39. "Lopez",
  40. "Mariamma Viju",
  41. "McCourty",
  42. "McCoy",
  43. "Miller",
  44. "Monaco",
  45. "Montague",
  46. "Morgan"
  47. ],
  48. "organizations": [
  49. "United States"
  50. ],
  51. "locations": [
  52. "Texas"
  53. ],
  54. "dates": [
  55. "06/29/2023",
  56. "2021",
  57. "2012",
  58. "1993",
  59. "2019",
  60. "1991",
  61. "2016",
  62. "2009",
  63. "2021",
  64. "2018",
  65. "1999",
  66. "2023",
  67. "2004"
  68. ],
  69. "reference_numbers": [
  70. "Case 22-1426",
  71. "Document 79",
  72. "3536060",
  73. "DOJ-OGR-00021656",
  74. "5 F.4th 279",
  75. "471 F. App'x 82",
  76. "990 F.2d 65",
  77. "932 F.3d 40",
  78. "944 F.2d 33",
  79. "No. 15 Cr. 240",
  80. "2016 WL 107841",
  81. "562 F.3d 458",
  82. "995 F.3d 32",
  83. "911 F.3d 638",
  84. "194 F.3d 381",
  85. "67 F.4th 520",
  86. "393 F.3d 192"
  87. ]
  88. },
  89. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of case references. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
  90. }