DOJ-OGR-00021657.json 3.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "10",
  4. "document_number": "79",
  5. "date": "06/29/2023",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page10 of 93\n\nix\n\nPAGE\n\nUnited States v. Moten,\n582 F.2d 654 (2d Cir. 1978) . . . . . . . . . 53, 58, 64\n\nUnited States v. Nader,\n425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) . . . . . . . . 41\n\nUnited States v. Noveck,\n271 U.S. 201 (1926). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48\n\nUnited States v. Padilla,\n186 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 1999) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16\n\nUnited States v. Payne,\n591 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24\n\nUnited States v. Piette,\n45 F.4th 1142 (10th Cir. 2022). . . . . . . . . . . . 41\n\nUnited States v. Prisco,\n391 F. App'x 920 (2d Cir. 2010) . . . . . . . . . 16, 24\n\nUnited States v. Restrepo,\n890 F. Supp. 180 (E.D.N.Y. 1995) . . . . . . . . . 25\n\nUnited States v. Richardson,\n512 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1975) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41\n\nUnited States v. Rommy,\n506 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . 72, 73\n\nUnited States v. Rourke,\n74 F.3d 802 (7th Cir. 1996) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26\n\nUnited States v. Russo,\n801 F.2d 624 (2d Cir. 1986) . . . . . . . . . . . . 16, 22\n\nUnited States v. Rutigliano,\n790 F.3d 389 (2d Cir. 2015) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33\n\nDOJ-OGR-00021657",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page10 of 93",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "ix\n\nPAGE",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "United States v. Moten,\n582 F.2d 654 (2d Cir. 1978) . . . . . . . . . 53, 58, 64\n\nUnited States v. Nader,\n425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) . . . . . . . . 41\n\nUnited States v. Noveck,\n271 U.S. 201 (1926). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48\n\nUnited States v. Padilla,\n186 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 1999) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16\n\nUnited States v. Payne,\n591 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24\n\nUnited States v. Piette,\n45 F.4th 1142 (10th Cir. 2022). . . . . . . . . . . . 41\n\nUnited States v. Prisco,\n391 F. App'x 920 (2d Cir. 2010) . . . . . . . . . 16, 24\n\nUnited States v. Restrepo,\n890 F. Supp. 180 (E.D.N.Y. 1995) . . . . . . . . . 25\n\nUnited States v. Richardson,\n512 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1975) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41\n\nUnited States v. Rommy,\n506 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . 72, 73\n\nUnited States v. Rourke,\n74 F.3d 802 (7th Cir. 1996) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26\n\nUnited States v. Russo,\n801 F.2d 624 (2d Cir. 1986) . . . . . . . . . . . . 16, 22\n\nUnited States v. Rutigliano,\n790 F.3d 389 (2d Cir. 2015) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021657",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Moten",
  36. "Nader",
  37. "Noveck",
  38. "Padilla",
  39. "Payne",
  40. "Piette",
  41. "Prisco",
  42. "Restrepo",
  43. "Richardson",
  44. "Rommy",
  45. "Rourke",
  46. "Russo",
  47. "Rutigliano"
  48. ],
  49. "organizations": [
  50. "United States"
  51. ],
  52. "locations": [
  53. "E.D. Va.",
  54. "E.D.N.Y."
  55. ],
  56. "dates": [
  57. "06/29/2023",
  58. "1978",
  59. "2019",
  60. "1926",
  61. "1999",
  62. "2010",
  63. "2022",
  64. "2010",
  65. "1995",
  66. "1975",
  67. "2007",
  68. "1996",
  69. "1986",
  70. "2015"
  71. ],
  72. "reference_numbers": [
  73. "22-1426",
  74. "79",
  75. "3536060",
  76. "DOJ-OGR-00021657"
  77. ]
  78. },
  79. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of case references. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
  80. }