mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021873.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "26",
    "document_number": "222414226",
    "date": "June 29, 2022",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case222414226 Docket:10971,10901720224,38686867 Page:42606626\n\n1. The District Court did not err in holding that Epstein's NPA with USAO-SDFL did not bar Maxwell's prosecution by USAO-SDNY.\n2. The District Court did not err in holding that the Indictment was filed within the statute of limitations.\n3. The District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.\n4. The District Court's response to a jury note did not result in a constructive amendment of, or prejudicial variance from, the allegations in the Indictment.\n5. The District Court's sentence was procedurally reasonable.\nFor the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.\n\n26\nDOJ-OGR-00021873",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1. The District Court did not err in holding that Epstein's NPA with USAO-SDFL did not bar Maxwell's prosecution by USAO-SDNY.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2. The District Court did not err in holding that the Indictment was filed within the statute of limitations.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3. The District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4. The District Court's response to a jury note did not result in a constructive amendment of, or prejudicial variance from, the allegations in the Indictment.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "5. The District Court's sentence was procedurally reasonable.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "26",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021873",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USAO-SDFL",
      "USAO-SDNY",
      "District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "SDNY",
      "SDFL"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "June 29, 2022"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "222414226",
      "10971",
      "10901720224",
      "38686867",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021873"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document related to the case of Maxwell, with a clear and legible format. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-structured and easy to follow."
}