mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00022034.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "11",
    "document_number": "33",
    "date": "04/09/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 33 Filed 04/09/20 Page 11 of 38\n\n3. As to both defendants, any and all reports, memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports created, manufactured or possessed by any investigative or disciplinary agencies, participating in the investigation of the defendants, allied with the prosecution, and to which the prosecution has access\n\nDefendant, Thomas, believes that the information contained in all of the requested documents may contain information that tends to exculpate him. He believes, in addition, that there may be other witnesses, or witness statements that are relevant, and which are not in the possession of the FBI investigators, who submitted reports in this case. Such reports will contain detailed information and statistics that show the conduct in which the defendant is being charged with a crime were: 1) rampant throughout the BOP; 2) made with knowledge and acquiescence by the leadership of the BOP; 3) made as a result of BOP policies that forced the defendant to engage in conduct for which he is now being charged criminally, and; 4) made in a manner which contains a possible discriminatory application of BOP policies by government prosecutors.\n\nThe information requested by this motion is not the only information that Mr. Thomas seeks under Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio. Further discovery motions will be necessary, once counsel has had the opportunity to review any response made by the government, in compliance with any order entered by this Court on this motion. The present motion is filed at this time because the government has refused the defendant's request to engage in a fair and impartial disclosure of relevant discovery. Early resolution of this dispute will enable defense counsel to determine the necessity and scope of pretrial subpoenas duces tecum.\n\n7\nDOJ-OGR-00022034",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 33 Filed 04/09/20 Page 11 of 38",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3. As to both defendants, any and all reports, memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports created, manufactured or possessed by any investigative or disciplinary agencies, participating in the investigation of the defendants, allied with the prosecution, and to which the prosecution has access",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Defendant, Thomas, believes that the information contained in all of the requested documents may contain information that tends to exculpate him. He believes, in addition, that there may be other witnesses, or witness statements that are relevant, and which are not in the possession of the FBI investigators, who submitted reports in this case. Such reports will contain detailed information and statistics that show the conduct in which the defendant is being charged with a crime were: 1) rampant throughout the BOP; 2) made with knowledge and acquiescence by the leadership of the BOP; 3) made as a result of BOP policies that forced the defendant to engage in conduct for which he is now being charged criminally, and; 4) made in a manner which contains a possible discriminatory application of BOP policies by government prosecutors.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The information requested by this motion is not the only information that Mr. Thomas seeks under Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio. Further discovery motions will be necessary, once counsel has had the opportunity to review any response made by the government, in compliance with any order entered by this Court on this motion. The present motion is filed at this time because the government has refused the defendant's request to engage in a fair and impartial disclosure of relevant discovery. Early resolution of this dispute will enable defense counsel to determine the necessity and scope of pretrial subpoenas duces tecum.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "7",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00022034",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Thomas"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "FBI",
      "BOP",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/09/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00830-AT",
      "Document 33",
      "DOJ-OGR-00022034"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is mostly typed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}