| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "2",
- "document_number": "35",
- "date": "04/24/20",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 35 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 34\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\nSTATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................................................................................... 2\nI. The Indictment................................................................................................................ 2\nII. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendant's Request for Additional Materials .................... 3\nA. The Government's Discovery Production ................................................................ 3\nB. Defense Requests for Additional Discovery Materials............................................ 4\nARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................... 7\nI. Applicable Law .............................................................................................................. 7\nA. Brady & Giglio ........................................................................................................ 7\nB. Rule 16.................................................................................................................... 8\nII. Thomas is Not Entitled to Additional Materials ............................................................ 8\nA. The Government Has Satisfied its Discovery and Disclosure Obligations ............... 8\nB. The Requested Records Are Not \"Material\" to Preparing a Defense and Are Sought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification ............................... 10\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 10\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 12\nC. The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who Were Not Part of the Prosecution Team ................................................................. 15\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 16\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 19\nD. Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure.......................... 21\nE. Thomas Has Not Carried His Burden With Respect to Discovery of Material in Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim ............................................................... 24\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 24\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 26\nCONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 29\n\nDOJ-OGR-00022064",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 35 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 34",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\nSTATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................................................................................... 2\nI. The Indictment................................................................................................................ 2\nII. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendant's Request for Additional Materials .................... 3\nA. The Government's Discovery Production ................................................................ 3\nB. Defense Requests for Additional Discovery Materials............................................ 4\nARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................... 7\nI. Applicable Law .............................................................................................................. 7\nA. Brady & Giglio ........................................................................................................ 7\nB. Rule 16.................................................................................................................... 8\nII. Thomas is Not Entitled to Additional Materials ............................................................ 8\nA. The Government Has Satisfied its Discovery and Disclosure Obligations ............... 8\nB. The Requested Records Are Not \"Material\" to Preparing a Defense and Are Sought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification ............................... 10\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 10\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 12\nC. The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who Were Not Part of the Prosecution Team ................................................................. 15\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 16\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 19\nD. Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure.......................... 21\nE. Thomas Has Not Carried His Burden With Respect to Discovery of Material in Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim ............................................................... 24\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 24\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 26\nCONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 29",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00022064",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Thomas"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "DOJ"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "04/24/20"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:19-cr-00830-AT",
- "Document 35",
- "DOJ-OGR-00022064"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The table of contents suggests that the document contains legal arguments and discussions related to discovery and disclosure obligations."
- }
|